DevilTheOptimizer

Welcome!

Hi DevilTheOptimizer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Geniac (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shubh Yatra has been accepted

Shubh Yatra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

<br><br>{{subst:uw-coi-warn|declared}}~~~~

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DreamRimmer (talk) 06:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Reply

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• Your text is all either unsourced or referenced to interviews with her, we need independent third-party sources, not her talking about herself

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• It's basically a fan page, her first name used throughout and gushing stuff like she embraced every opportunity that came her way, big or small... Her motto is to seize every opportunities for the valuable experiences it brings... The studio quickly became a beloved destination... Anmol worked wonders with her makeup skills, creating mesmerizing bridal and glamorous looks that left people captivated by her talent... I'd remind you that if you are being paid to write this promo, you must declare it

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BaagadBillaa (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BaagadBillaa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, DevilTheOptimizer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Saiyar Mori Re for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saiyar Mori Re is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiyar Mori Re until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 17:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Paperpopscissors per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paperpopscissors. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

@Bbb23 Dear Bbb23, I already mentioned the concern in my unblock request 2 times and it was rejected. I submitted 3rd request a weeks ago and no has review it. Can you go through this? As I already told that it's just misunderstanding.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account was banned due to an alleged association with multiple accounts, specifically with the user 'Paperpopscissors.' I want to clarify that I have no connection with the mentioned user and do not possess any other accounts. I solely own the 'DevilTheOptimizer' account. Can you please review and lift the ban on my account? Thank you.

Decline reason:

Simple denial is not sufficient. Please address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paperpopscissors. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for reply.

In regards to page intersection, I regularly update articles about Gujarati Cinema. I believe there are only a few individuals who contribute to the improvement of articles on Gujarati Cinema, and just because of that it states my intersection with any individual? I simply edit to improve articles.

I have also been accused of using multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Paperpopscissors. I want to clarify that I do not own or control this account. I already have my own account and I am happily contributing to Wikipedia. You can review my edits. @Yamla

Still awaiting for response. @Yamla

I have already reviewed your request. If you wish to be unblocked, please make a new unblock request and another admin will review it. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I regularly update articles about Gujarati Cinema. I believe there are only a few individuals who contribute to the improvement of articles on Gujarati Cinema, and just because of that it states my intersection with any individual? I really don't know why I'm accused for such reason. I simply edit to improve articles. I have also been accused of using multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Paperpopscissors. I want to clarify that I do not own or control this account. I already have my own account and I am happily contributing to Wikipedia. You can review my edits. DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 11:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It isn't just that you edit in the same broad topic area, but you edit similar specific articles. 331dot (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There are merely few articles for Gujarati Cinema who meets the guideline. I already mention that there are only few people who actually create that and if someone creates and I improve does this mean sockpuppet? Please check my edits again, and see I improve articles by following guideline, and made necesarry changes whether with the data or grammatical. I'm really confused about this. I just dig and found Nizil Shah and Ankitbhm are mostly create articles for Gujarati Cinema, so if I edit articles created by anyone will made me sockpuppet? So I really apologise as I haven't read such Wikipedia Guideline, and that's the reason for blocking me. Do let me know what should I can do. @331dot

You may make another unblock request for someone else to review. It might help if you agreed to abandon editing in that topic area at least for a time. 331dot (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

It's been 14 Days and no one has reviewed unblock request yet. Can you let me know what can I do? @331dot

@Coderzombie Hi, My account is block and the reason for the block is Sockpuppet. I already submitted request 3 times and it was rejected 2 times. I also made 3rd request however no one has responded to it yet. I already explained that, there are merely few People who contributing in Gujarati Cinema and I belive you're already aware of that, so if you or anyone created article or made edits and in that same articles I make improve doesn't shows anything like sockpuppet. Can you let me know what I can do now as my unblock request is still pending.

@Coderzombie I'm awating for the response.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been month I submitted the request now. I regularly update articles about Gujarati Cinema, and there are merely few individuals who contribute to the improvement of articles on Gujarati Cinema, and just because of that it shouldn't states my intersection with any individual. I simply edit to improve articles. I have also been accused of using multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Paperpopscissors, and I want to clarify that I do not own or control this or any other accounts. I already have my own account and I am happily contributing to Wikipedia, you can have a look at my edits as well. Hence for a while I'll not make edits in articles regarding Gujarati Cinema. I hope this finds well. DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 05:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's been a while and I hate for you to have to end this wait with a decline, but really, the language of your request seems to suggest to me that you've been editing with another account during this period. You'll have to offer more clarity about this. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhaskar Bose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhaskar Bose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Submitting Unblock Request as No one is responding

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Made another request as no one is responding to my earlier request.

I regularly update articles about Gujarati Cinema, and there are merely few individuals who contribute to the improvement of articles on Gujarati Cinema, and just because of that it shouldn't states my intersection with any individual. I simply edit to improve articles. I have also been accused of using multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Paperpopscissors, and I want to clarify that I do not own or control this or any other accounts. I already have my own account and I am happily contributing to Wikipedia, you can have a look at my edits as well. Hence for a while I'll not make edits in articles regarding Gujarati Cinema. I hope this finds well.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: Please don't open more than one request at a time. I'm sorry for the delay, but the backlog is large and appeals are tackled in no particular order. The best way to expedite the process is to formulate an appeal that is clear, concise, and convincing. You may edit your original appeal at any time, as long as nobody has responded to it. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Unblock Request 5

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm submitting 5th Unblock Reason. My last request declined for the reason that I was editing with another account. I'm clarifying that I haven't made any edits since my account got block as I don't own any other account. I've mentioned this every time that I solely own DevilTheOptimizer account only. My account got block as someone find that I'm using multiple account, as there were merely few people editing about Gujarati Cinema so some articles might edited by me and the other user. The respected use who block the account consider that I'm using multiple account, although I don't own or know the account user at all. I had tried to convey this message 4 times hence my request are denied. I'm again confirming that I solely own DevilTheOptimizer and because of misunderstanding I'll not make any edits regarding Gujarati Cinema for a while. I really hopes that this finds well.

Decline reason:

You haven't indicated what other articles you would be working on. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DevilTheOptimizer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, This is my 6th Request, and I'm requesting after more than 6 Months. As per my previous request I'm again sticking with my stand that I only own these account only and I haven't have do anything with any other account. I again want to be editor and improve Wikipedia. There are merely few people who do work to improve Gujarati Cinema here. I believe after so many months you can know that the allegation for which I've been penalized is totally misunderstanding of some people. To whomsoever concern, if you can see there are merely few people who edits in Wikipedia for Gujarati cinema, so you can understand that the allegation of editing same pages are totally misunderstanding only. Apart from me, User: Ankitbhm, and Nizil Shah are were the most active people who were editing the Gujarati Cinema and someone thought that Ankitbhm and I were the one person and blocked the account although Nizil Shah were also doing these, however no one has suspect. So I again request that these is totally misunderstanding and would like to revoke my suspension so that I can again start working to improve it. I hope these finds well. As there isn't any prrof I am able to provide to prove my innocence in these matter.

Accept reason:

Given the time that has elapsed, it seems safe to lift the block. Please see my comments below. Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

WP:CHECKUSER technical data is not helpful in this case determining whether or not there's been recent block evasion. I will note that it's been more than six months since all three accounts were blocked. --Yamla (talk) 16:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Still awaiting for the decision. DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

This unblock request has been pending for a long time. I am considering unblocking on the basis of "time already served" and allowing another chance. @Bbb23, Yamla, 331dot, Daniel Case, Blablubbs, and UtherSRG: as the admins who have addressed prior unblock requests, please let me know if you have any thoughts on this. Thank you, Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Happy for you to handle this as you see fit. 331dot (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

No objections now. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

No objections from me. --Yamla (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Sounds fine. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

I have no objections.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Unblocked

Given the time that has elapsed since the original block, and with the consent of the admins who have looked into this block before I did, I am lifting the block and allowing this editor another chance. Please make every effort to comply with our policies and guidelines in the future. Good luck! Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank You @Newyorkbrad. Should I remove the Block Template from my User Page Now? Also mostly I'll be editing and creating article related entertainment industy especially Gujarati. Will that be okay right? DevilTheOptimizer (talk) 05:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. Since you are unblocked, you may edit your userpage as you wish, including removing the template. You are also free to edit articles about any topics you wish to, but please be mindful of the guidelines on conflicts of interest if you are editing about people or topics with whom you have a personal or professional relationship. Good luck! Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 05:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)