User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Coffeeandcrumbs. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lists on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Baishe Niangniang on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Protected images
Hi, hope you're well. After your excellent work in scaling main page images consistently, could you look at applying the same scaling to the protected queue at Wikipedia:Main Page/Commons media protection? This would give a better idea of how the images will look on the MP, especially for non-portraits. It currently just displays as 100x100. Thanks in advance, Stephen 02:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Stephen, something like this seems like too much work for admins. But, if you think it is worth it, that is one implementation that works. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 05:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Current Events
Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject for the edits you have done on Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates and other articles in the WikiProject's scope. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to invite you and hope you consider joining. (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice
Hi, Coffeeandcrumbs! Just to inform you that there is an ongoing discussion in Talk:Luis Arce on whether the article can be improved adding the hypocorism "Lucho" to the lead (and if affirmative, how it should be included). Because I read somewhere that pinging someone with a "red" userpage does not always work. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Friendly note
Hello C&C, I thought with your interest in Patrick Healy, you might also bee interested in his predecessor, John Early, whose FAC has sadly gotten little attention. If you have a spare moment and care to leave some comments, that'd be appreciated as always. If your attention is preoccupied elsewhere, I understand completely. Ergo Sum 05:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October harvest
 | |
| harvest |
Thank you so much for work on articles and ITN that I see above! - Main page history has again been missing, - could you help, please? (see my talk, first red link, and at least to 16 before.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, Gerda. I started discussion here. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- thank you, beautiful Main page today, don't miss the pic by a blocked user (of a 2013 play critical of refugee politics), nor a related video, interviews mostly German, but music and scene. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I haven't learned the rules on titles and captions for the new format ... did I get it right? - Dank (push to talk) 02:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Modern recording of "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too" - Dank, looks good to me. I am not aware of any set rules.
- BTW, it would be nice to change the November 3, 2020 to a recording of the song instead of a non-legible image of the sheet music cover.
{{Main page image/TFA|image= Tip and Ty again.ogg |caption= Modern recording of "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too" }}--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 04:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)I don't recall that we've done that, but I don't have any objection if you want to propose it. - Dank (push to talk) 04:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)- This is Wehwalt's blurb ... Wehwalt, thoughts? - Dank (push to talk) 05:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- November 3, I think you mean? I have no objection in principle but if that's in place of the image I'd think it would look a little blah. I think we did either audio or video once prior to my being a coordinator.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Wehwalt, too late for me to do it but you can copy the text above and take a look. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- I've done it with slightly modified caption. We'll see who salutes.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Wehwalt, too late for me to do it but you can copy the text above and take a look. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- November 3, I think you mean? I have no objection in principle but if that's in place of the image I'd think it would look a little blah. I think we did either audio or video once prior to my being a coordinator.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
About the error report: I went with "U.S." because, for those people who just flew in from Mars and don't understand, "American" is in the second sentence. (Also, the style guides generally prefer "U.S." when it's used as an adjective in the sense of "federal".) But it wouldn't bother me at all if someone wants to change it to "United States"; it's not a burning issue. - Dank (push to talk) 00:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is 
Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. 
The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with 
Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were 
Hog Farm (submissions), 
HaEr48 (submissions), 
Harrias (submissions) and 
Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The article Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Maile66, any ideas for a hook? --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'll give it some thought. Not sure what was not already public knowledge. — Maile (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
This was in the news, but maybe not everybody saw it, and it is a bit unusual for a funeral: — Maile (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- ... that Ruth Bader Ginsburg's personal trainer Bryant Johnson honored her by doing three push-ups in front of her casket? Moore, Elena (September 25, 2020). "Ginsburg's Trainer Honors Late Justice With Pushups At Capitol Hill Memorial". NPR. Retrieved September 25, 2020.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
- ... that in honor of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a white collar like hers was placed on the Fearless Girl sculpture outside the New York Stock Exchange?."Monuments Across New York City Pay Tribute to Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Town & Country. September 22, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
Discogs
Hi. Thanks for your comment. Is there a discussion where Discogs has been found to be unreliable? I've found it to be one of the best sites covering older music of the 1940s and 1950s. Is there another site covering older music that you think would be a good substitute? Cbl62 (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Is it due to the crowdsourcing of content? Cbl62 (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Cbl62, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources:
The content on Discogs is user-generated, and is therefore generally unreliable. There was consensus against deprecating Discogs in a 2019 RfC, as editors noted that external links to the site may be appropriate.
~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC) - Yes. See: WP:RSP#Discogs. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you both. Cbl62 (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Any suggestions for a good comprehensive source covering basic data (release date, label, etc.) for songs from the 1930s to 1950s? Cbl62 (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Cbl62, if a fact is notable, you can find it in a book. I have seen several books listed on Google Books that have a complete jazz discography of those periods. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Understood. It's just a bit surprising that there's not an authoritative database for these sorts of basic facts. In the worlds of movies and sports, such authoritative databases abound. Cbl62 (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Cbl62, if a fact is notable, you can find it in a book. I have seen several books listed on Google Books that have a complete jazz discography of those periods. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Cbl62, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources:
- Is it due to the crowdsourcing of content? Cbl62 (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Template:POTD/2019-07-21 – featured picture at Portal:History
Template:POTD/2019-07-21—a POTD subpage which you contributed to—has been added to the featured picture section of the Portal:History. —andrybak (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- And many other POTDs on other portals, including Template:POTD/2019-07-22 at Portal:Technology. Thank you for your contributions to POTDs. —andrybak (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Coffeeandcrumbs,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Explanatory supplement
I count this as good progress! :) —valereee (talk) 16:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, I am so exhausted and I wouldn't know where to begin writing such a thing. I would need a lot of help. Maybe after the holidays if you, ProcrastinatingReader, and Levivich are willing to help write it. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm thinking just create a page, write a few sentences about the purpose of the guideline and a link to the RfC that resulted in its creation, and (most importantly) slap the flowchart into the page. Then we add the explanatory supplement template and add it into the AT policy page as a link. Not the preferred result, but it may well work I'm thinking: we can do a bunch of bold moves quoting the newly created explanatory supplement and (assuming none get reverted, I wouldn't really expect they would be) we're good. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Of course I'll help. And PR is right. Writing is hard. Editing is easy. Put up a page with the flowchart, a link to RfC, and a starting content that "This is the flowchart for evaluating article titles about deaths." Then just go do something else. Take a bubble bath or something. PR will no doubt add whatever template and links they're talking about in their nerdy ways I don't understand. ;) It'll grow. :) —valereee (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- +1 to all of the above. I congratulate you C&C, you really pushed a heavy rock up a big hill. Levivich harass/hound 04:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Of course I'll help. And PR is right. Writing is hard. Editing is easy. Put up a page with the flowchart, a link to RfC, and a starting content that "This is the flowchart for evaluating article titles about deaths." Then just go do something else. Take a bubble bath or something. PR will no doubt add whatever template and links they're talking about in their nerdy ways I don't understand. ;) It'll grow. :) —valereee (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm thinking just create a page, write a few sentences about the purpose of the guideline and a link to the RfC that resulted in its creation, and (most importantly) slap the flowchart into the page. Then we add the explanatory supplement template and add it into the AT policy page as a link. Not the preferred result, but it may well work I'm thinking: we can do a bunch of bold moves quoting the newly created explanatory supplement and (assuming none get reverted, I wouldn't really expect they would be) we're good. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Hitler on OTD
December 20 isn't really a good day to list Hitler. He should be put on a day that is one of the most important for him. I was going to put him on January 30 (when he was appointed chancellor), but there's already another Hitler article there, so he needs another home. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 07:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Howcheng, it is so hard. No way we are going to use his birthday. But there has to be a date that fits but does not overtly offend. I will keep looking. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 09:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK stats
Congratulations! With 10,585 views, your Thomas J. White hook is the one of the most viewed non-lead/photo hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wow! I guess I am not the only one that finds his life story interesting. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 12:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- First one of 2021, too! Congratulations! ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- ProcrastinatingReader, what a nice surprise! Thank you so much! This has brightened my night. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not to mention your leadership at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (violence and deaths) —valereee (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- ProcrastinatingReader, what a nice surprise! Thank you so much! This has brightened my night. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Congratulations, C&C! - Wikipedia 20 years, a nice match. I am proud of a little contrib, today, and also 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, - displayed here. What I don't like is a) that there's no b-version in Main page history, b) that the Main page history of the earlier days don't show the appropriate banners, but also today's. Help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, b-versions are save at the end of the day. 10 to 20 minutes before they leave the main page to catch any last minute changes. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 18:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, learned something again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is embarrassing, but what's a b-version? —valereee (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)—valereee (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- It is a recent thing. We started archiving the main page twice a day: Wikipedia:Main Page history/2021 January 14b. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is embarrassing, but what's a b-version? —valereee (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)—valereee (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, learned something again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, b-versions are save at the end of the day. 10 to 20 minutes before they leave the main page to catch any last minute changes. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 18:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, I just now realized what you meant. I saved a copy for posterity. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.png)
Elizabeth Willing Powel scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Elizabeth Willing Powel article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 17, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 17, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the article - finally a woman in 2021! - introduced: "Elizabeth Willing Powel has been called a forgotten "Founding Mother" of the United States. An apt moniker for a woman perhaps forgotten by history but whose influence on early American History is evident in her communiques with the notables of her period, including many of the Founding Fathers of the United States who she entertained at her home at Powel House (now a museum in Philadelphia). She is most often remembered for a light exchange with Benjamin Franklin which became an often quoted statement about the Constitution of the United States. The story goes as such: a "lady" asked Franklin "What have we got, a republic or a monarchy?", to which he responded, "A republic ... if you can keep it". Who this "lady" was is often glossed over. This article attempts to answer that question with the best sources available today. Powel was a kingmaker and power broker of her time who counseled Supreme Court justices, presidents, senators, and mayors."! - Happy WP 20! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The joys of having an article on the MP, eh? :D ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt and ProcrastinatingReader, thank you both. Vandalism is a small price to pay for a main page appearance. Her appearance on the main page only 3 days before we depose a wannabe monarch is appropriate.
- "What have we got, a republic or a monarchy?"
- "A republic ... if you can keep it" --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Annandale High School on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was reading Margaret Hamilton (software engineer) and saw that you were a major contributor to this article and had nominated it for GA a few years back. I just wanted to say that (1) I thought the article was quite well done, (2) that the subject was very interesting and admirable, and (3) that if you ever want to put it back up for GA review, I'd be happy to be the one to do the review. Anyway, sorry for the random message, and thanks for creating a cool article! DocFreeman24 (talk) 06:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- DocFreeman24, I appreciate that. I did plan on getting back to it sometime. I will let you know if I do nominate it again.
- Feel free to improve it and nominate it for GA yourself. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 16:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Arlene King
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arlene King, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.- The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.- Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.
.svg){kind=small}
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:George H. W. Bush's 1992 trip to Asia
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George H. W. Bush's 1992 trip to Asia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK processes
Is this OK per DYK processes? I told Z it was all theirs, since I don’t do DYK and they didn’t need to add my name ... not sure though if my name is required ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia, totally up to you I think. We usually give credit to the creator, even if they are not the nominator. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I don't need it, so hope it is OK with you that I reverted it. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia, no problem at all. Thanks for the heads up but it was not necessary.
- I am concerned that the article unduly focuses on the Challenger disaster. Not saying trim down that part but we should add more about his career before and after the disaster. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Will leave that to Z1720 if they want to add more; I just put in the basics to get a solid article started (and doubt that sources focus on much other than the Challenger). And again, this is why I don't do DYK; I was not aware that DYKs had to be comprehensive. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I don't need it, so hope it is OK with you that I reverted it. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Responding on my phone because my computer is doing an update for five hours with no end in sight. Coffeeandcrumbs Before nominating the article for DYK I looked for additional information and sources on various databases. Sources mostly focus on his role in the Challenger explosion and the subsequent investigation. I'll keep looking when my computer is done its update, but I don't have much hope in finding more info. Z1720 (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I guess something has changed (and I sure don’t keep up with DYK), but I thought that DYK was for new articles, and that expansion was expected ... that we do it to encourage editors to engage and expand, but we don’t expect DYKs to be finished. Oh, well ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I just read through the DYK rules and supplementary rules twice and I could not find a requirement that DYK articles be comprehensive. I'll still look for more info to add to the article, but as far as I am concerned, it is good to go for a DYK nom. If I am mistaken please link me the info so I can determine how to get this article to conform to that requirement. Z1720 (talk) 23:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I was just commenting as an observer. I have no intention to stand in the way of it appearing on DYK. If no other info is available about his career, that is that.
- It was a interesting article. I hope it quickly makes it through DYK review and on to the main page. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thx, C&C; the whole deal here was that I don’t know anything about DYK processes, and don’t have the time or interest to learn, which is why I offered the DYK to Z1720 ... and then I felt bad for putting up a fine start to an article that wasn’t even worthy of a DYK, or so I thought ... my only experience with DYK is finding copyvio and uncited hooks and translation errors over and over and over ... when I see them on the main page, I speak up. And that’s all I know! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for commenting on the article. I hope my comments were taken in the good faith that they were intended to be, and if they caused you any stress or worry then I am sorry and I need to choose better language next time (and hopefully not comment on my phone because my computer was in the middle of a 7-hour computer update!) I hope this article is the best it can be when it's posted on the main page. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of just complaining about it, I decided to lend a hand. I hope that helps! Thank you for creating this article!! --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I quite intentionally left room for expansion, as I thought that was the idea of DYK ... to encourage other editors who read the mainpage to engage! Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of just complaining about it, I decided to lend a hand. I hope that helps! Thank you for creating this article!! --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for commenting on the article. I hope my comments were taken in the good faith that they were intended to be, and if they caused you any stress or worry then I am sorry and I need to choose better language next time (and hopefully not comment on my phone because my computer was in the middle of a 7-hour computer update!) I hope this article is the best it can be when it's posted on the main page. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thx, C&C; the whole deal here was that I don’t know anything about DYK processes, and don’t have the time or interest to learn, which is why I offered the DYK to Z1720 ... and then I felt bad for putting up a fine start to an article that wasn’t even worthy of a DYK, or so I thought ... my only experience with DYK is finding copyvio and uncited hooks and translation errors over and over and over ... when I see them on the main page, I speak up. And that’s all I know! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I just read through the DYK rules and supplementary rules twice and I could not find a requirement that DYK articles be comprehensive. I'll still look for more info to add to the article, but as far as I am concerned, it is good to go for a DYK nom. If I am mistaken please link me the info so I can determine how to get this article to conform to that requirement. Z1720 (talk) 23:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julia Margaret Cameron and Talk:Proud Boys on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Arlene King
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arlene King".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Malassezia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Goths on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Middle Eastern superheroes on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James A. Johnson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Jenna Haze GA Reassessment
Jenna Haze, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Whiteguru (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:A republic ... if you can keep it
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A republic ... if you can keep it, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Wheat Field with Reaper and Sun
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wheat Field with Reaper and Sun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Breonna Taylor (graduation photo).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Breonna Taylor (graduation photo).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Frontman830 (talk) 02:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
File:Breonna Taylor (graduation photo).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breonna Taylor (graduation photo).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 23:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I was cruising the artist drafts and found the one you had created for Harvey Otis Young. I added three museum collections. Beyond that, your work is so precise and carefully done that I could not see anything wrong with it. I moved it to article space. Thanks for your great contributions. --- Possibly ☎ 02:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:George H. W. Bush's 1992 trip to Asia
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George H. W. Bush's 1992 trip to Asia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Just thought I'd mention
Hi C&C, since you've been interested in some similar articles I've nominated at FAC, I thought I'd just mention that I've nominated another, Anthony Kohlmann. If you care to leave any comments, they'd be appreciated as always. Ergo Sum 13:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Timothy J. Edens for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello Coffeeandcrumbs,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Chetsford: Would you kindly remove the "new page reviewer" right from me? I don't often use it and don't expect to any time soon. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 04:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, how time flies! --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Right! - I see that no Main page history has been written for a while, and told Amalthea. Help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tidying up some unused templates
Hi there! A small group of editors is working on tidying up Template space, focusing on templates that have no transclusions and appear to be abandoned or otherwise not useful. I came across these nine pages on a report, and I wonder if you have any use for them. If not, you can place {{Db-author}} on each page to have them speedily deleted, or I can run them through the normal Templates for Discussion process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done. thanks! --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 07:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I know it seems like a drop in the ocean, but getting nine pages off of a 5,000-page report this easily (i.e. without wading through TFD) is helpful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
FAR for Sasha (DJ)
I have nominated Sasha (DJ) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
native_name on infobox
Hi.. two years ago, you put closure on this RfC. Just want to clarify something on that closure. Does it means the usage of native script (non latin script) on native_name parameter is allowed? Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: Yes, and may be even generally encouraged unless there is a consensus not to do so reached on the talk page of the article for reasons not mentioned in the closing note. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Coffeeandcrumbs: Thank you.. That's what I thought as well. The reason I ask is because I have disagreement (again) with other editor regarding that matter, and he seems to disregard that consensus. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: I see that, looking at your contributions recently. By someone who was participated in the discussion. If it happening repeatedly, you should first bring that to the attention of the person on their talk page and if that does not work, post at WP:ANI. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 03:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Coffeeandcrumbs: Noted. Thank you for your suggestion. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just to let you know that unfortunately the issue persists and I have posted it on WP:ANI. Ckfasdf (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: I see that, looking at your contributions recently. By someone who was participated in the discussion. If it happening repeatedly, you should first bring that to the attention of the person on their talk page and if that does not work, post at WP:ANI. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 03:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Coffeeandcrumbs: Thank you.. That's what I thought as well. The reason I ask is because I have disagreement (again) with other editor regarding that matter, and he seems to disregard that consensus. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Space 2019/POTD/July 21
Template:WikiProject Space 2019/POTD/July 21 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs,
This looks ready to submit to AFC but it's an expiring draft. Did you want to continue to work on it? You should have received a notice in November from Firefly Bot about its nearing CSD G13 status. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- I see from the page history that Firefly Bot did notify you in May 2021. Once it notifies you once, unfortunately it skips notifying you a second time at a later date. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: Thanks for flagging for me. I think it is about time I finished up and published that page. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 19:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Space 2019/talk header
Template:WikiProject Space 2019/talk header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 20:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I am confused about how to tell if a specific FP has been POTD
I was curious to see if my photo (File:Gateway_Generating_Station_rectified.jpg) had ever been a picture of the day. Per the Commons categories, it doesn't appear to have. So I figured maybe it would be in Category:Featured pictures that have not appeared on the Main Page... but this is an en-wiki category, so I don't think the file could be in there. Is there a way to tell whether not a photo has been POTD before? (And, of course, if this hasn't been, is there a nomination process?) jp×g 07:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- That files has not been featured on the Main Page. It is in Category:Featured pictures that have not appeared on the Main Page. While this category is en-wiki, it tracks Commons files. Featured pictures have a local en-wiki description page: File:Gateway Generating Station rectified.jpg. It is dutifully created by User:Armbrust when they close the FP nomination as successful. That automatically adds the FP to the category. When the page becomes POTD, a bot adds {{Picture of the day}}. Because of the functionality of {{Featured picture}}, adding {{Picture of the day}}, removes the file from the category.
- tl;dr: everything is working as it should. the file is the category. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- @JPxG:, as for the selection process, it usually follows the principle of "first come, first serve". Meaning FP that are older are made POTD first. We are currently doing FP that were awarded in late 2019. However, POTD are completely at the discretion of the editors working in the area. Currently that is mostly, Cwmhiraeth and Amakuru. Most FPs are of birds, bank notes, and U.S. presidents and coat of arms. There is not much variety. I think Amakuru and Cwmhiraeth may appreciate the uniqueness of this photo and want to use it sooner than later. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- And the article is a GA too: Gateway Generating Station. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well it is a relatively recent picture, but it will provide variety so I will list it to appear soon and you will get a notification on your talk page of when that may happen. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey! Hope you don't mind, wanted to uncrop this, so... Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.7% of all FPs 05:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not at all. Voted with a suggestion. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Suggestion taken! And, hey, him getting a second go on the main page won't hurt anything, aye? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.7% of all FPs 16:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Since I just realised you were asking about nominating this a while ago... So, turns out one of the images was a featured picture, and, hence, Reaper (Van Gogh series) is due to be on the main page late June.
Actually, do you think you could help me with something related to that? Wikipedia:Picture_of_the_day/Unused#Doubts_as_to_whether_this_is_the_preferred_version has two Van Goghs in it, and they vary wildly from the other copies of the same painting from the Van Gogh museum. Think you could have a look?
There's also a third one, but I don't know if there's much we can do about it, barring writing an article on it. I suppose, if you do, I can guarantee the article a spot on POTD. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 00:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- I think the first two maybe good cases for delist and replace. There are actually a few options for the one with crows. The third painting just needs an article. I might be able to help with that this summer. I will put it on my to do list for new article creations. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Coffeeandcrumbs,
This is to let you know that File:Eva Le Gallienne (mnwp.275003, cropped restoration).jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 12, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-12. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 11:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
|
Eva Le Gallienne (1899–1991) was a British-born American stage actress, producer, director, translator, and author. A Broadway star by age 21, Le Gallienne gave up her Broadway appearances to devote herself to founding the Civic Repertory Theatre, in which she was both director, producer, and lead actress. Noted for her boldness and idealism, she became a pioneering figure in the American repertory movement, which enabled today's off-Broadway. A versatile and eloquent actress herself (playing roles ranging from Peter Pan to Hamlet), Le Gallienne also became a respected stage director, coach, producer and manager. Photograph credit: Nicholas Haz; restored by Coffeeandcrumbs
Recently featured:
|
Women in Red in July 2022
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Main page history
 |
Looking at Wikipedia:Main Page history/2021 November 12, I don't know what happened? Some template change? - Anyway, the reason to look was an exceptional concert, with my pic of the conductor happy, and the review showing him with some boys. Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Four years! |
|---|
Women in Red in August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August songs
 |
pics and thoughts on 13 August - what do you think of sempé for RD? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Look at the church where I heard VOCES8. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Nuvei for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuvei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Bertazzoni for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertazzoni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Women in Red October 2022
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Muslim American Society
Hi. Short answer is, the banned user is User:Billy Hathorn, whose contributions were problematic enough on multiple fronts that we're doing a long-term cleanup on it. Honestly, since what I removed is mostly an attributed quote, if it's being restored I'm not going to fight it, though I'd certainly prefer prose in their own words instead of taking the easy way out. Wizardman 21:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
FPC second image
FYI, per your suggestion in the nom, I added the second image to This FPC nomination. Bammesk (talk) 02:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Voted. The only reason I didn't vote was because I haven't been around much. Since my comment seems to have slowed down the voting, I went ahead and added my vote.
- Did you know you can see the astronauts in the reflection of each other's helmet? --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't know that, I zoomed in real good and saw it. That's cool. Cheers. Bammesk (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays | |
| Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
Women in Red January 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Farha (film)
On 28 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Farha (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the film Farha, which depicts the killing of a Palestinian family by Israeli soldiers during the Nakba, became the subject of a downvoting campaign? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Farha (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Farha (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Some baklava for you!
|
Thanks for your recent work on Middle Eastern film! A well written article on a worthy subject. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Naila Ayesh
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naila Ayesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings! I have restored this deleted subject, which you have previously edited, on the expectation that new sources will be found postdating the 2020 deletion of the article. If you are still interested in this subject, please add to this effort. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Eccekevin (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
|
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
2023
 | |
| happy new year |
|---|
Today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. - Do you know why Wikipedia:Main Page history/2020 September 1 looks so strange? - just say that per chance. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Gerda Arendt, yes, I plan to fix all those sometime soon. It is monotonous work. @Izno and @xaosflux figured out the issue. But the fix is a bit complicated and requires planning. Once planned out a bot or myself using WP:AWB could fix all the issues on all the pages in one fell swoop. I just need to sit down and get to it. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 19:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- understand --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- With the new layout, it seems to have gotten even worse. - Back from vacation - Melitta Muszely died, RIP - the other story is 10 years old OTD ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)