Chimon21

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sherry Chayat. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SudoGhost 22:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sherry Chayat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MadGuy7023 (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

So I am allowed one warning...NICEChimon21 (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

ReallChimon21 (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Chimon21 (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - SudoGhost 22:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Chimon21, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Chimon21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank You

I am new to wiki and will do my best to learn your protocols from this point forward. However, one thing I am not new to is journalistic integrity and principles. I can understand the site shimanoarchives.com is used to bring about the dealings of Eido Shimano Roshi whom, in my opinion, is a very sick man. So be it...But when an undocumented anonymous .pdf shows up claiming to be an email thread between two people (neither of which are Eido) on that site and and editor at wiki wants to use it against a student of Eido...that is in and of itself...poor journalism and can be considered... borderline Trolling.

All I asked for from the editor was proof of it's validity...they said that because it came from that site it makes it so. it is a .com, not a .org or a .gov...anybody can make a site and say anything they want...that is why we are a "free" society. But what structures are in place there to assure journalistic integrity I ask?

My point is...The Eido scandal is true. He is a sick man that has abused his authority. Fine...do what you need to do to discredit him but to post unverified, unsubstantiated alleged emails between two parties that are not Shimano about others that are not him...is not acceptable journalisticChimon21 (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC) behavior for even the likes of Fox News. Wiki has an opportunity to really set some basic journalistic standards and I look forward to becoming apart of this community.Chimon21 (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, that's clear language - a "mission statement", so to speak. Some good advice: expand your user-profile. I first thought your were a WP:SOCK, defending Shimano. The use of numbers in your user-name doesn't help in this respect. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raul7213/Archive to get an impression why. Increasing your user-profile, including part of the above statement, helps to counter such impressions.

You can also make subpages for specific topics, for example "Tools" with shortcuts to protocols etc, and "Sources" for sources you use. See User:Joshua Jonathan for examples. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:AngeloZuccolo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AngeloZuccolo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelo Zuccolo (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 01:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)