User talk:Bookku/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non-vegetarian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Can you present your view

Can you present your opinion here. Thanks A poor son of Adam (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I just read what you wrote for RAJIVVASUDEV a while back about what do when you run into an cranky older editor that lives to remove the content of others instead of creating new content of their own. It was exactly what I need to read to help me break off from a situation. It is not even something I care about that much. It is like getting sucked into their road rage. Anyway, thanks for wise and clarity. I am smiling again.

Rublamb (talk) 00:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai

Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 06:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sexual politics

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sexual politics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

PTI party dictatorship

Please add dictatorship in Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf ideology and accused section, The PTI party has been accused by the opposition parties, media and think tanks to imposing civil dictatorship in Pakistan

Sources. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.141.159.74 (talk) 10:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

You can make such request at article talk page so other users can also take a call. Remember one thing usually Pakistani and Indian both Wikipedians do not prefer refs from other country's media. happy wikipedia editing

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mansiya V. P.

On 2 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mansiya V. P., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mansiya V. P., an Indian classical dancer, has experimented with choreographing a fusion of classical Bharatnatyam and traditional Sufi music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mansiya V.P.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mansiya V. P.), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

1983 Women's March, Lahore

Bookku, we may both believe that the government of Pakistan is a dictatorship but should that be said in Wikivoice? It would be different if it was quoted directly to a source. --ARoseWolf 18:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

@ARoseWolf:, you are right. Now I have attempted to tweak/modify a bit with word 'regime' and still I am having a feeling sentence needs a little better articulation.

As much as I am seeking to focus on academic sources I am getting distracted with real life. I hope this week I should be able to work on further at least on couple of articles including this one.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Actually, that looks much better as it is. I'll continue looking over the article today if I get some time. --ARoseWolf 12:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks, It's very nice of you. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Lynching of Deborah Yakubu

Just a note that this has passed DYK review. Thanks for nominating it! MartinPoulter (talk) 10:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/National Women's Day (Pakistan) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lettergate

Hello! Your submission of Lettergate at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 18:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Bookku, this nomination has been marked for closure as unsuccessful. If you wish to reply to the decision, please comment on the nomination page. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Lynching of Deborah Yakubu

On 1 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lynching of Deborah Yakubu, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that "What do you hope to achieve with this?" were the last words of the Nigerian college student Deborah Yakubu while being lynched for alleged blasphemy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lynching of Deborah Yakubu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lynching of Deborah Yakubu), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 23,985 views (999.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bookku

Thank you for creating 1983 Lahore march.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aroosa Alam

Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aroosa Alam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

WP:UNDUE

It is time for you to read WP:UNDUE.

There was no need to add this or this since this has been already discussed on the article. Every possible view does not require coverage.

I also note this is not happening for the first time.[10] Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Pl see Talk:2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy#Deletion of well sourced content? Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for National Women's Day (Pakistan)

On 27 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Women's Day (Pakistan), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that National Women's Day in Pakistan commemorates a 1983 march against a law that devalued the testimony of Pakistani women to half that of men? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Women's Day (Pakistan). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, National Women's Day (Pakistan)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 1983 women's march, Lahore

On 27 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1983 women's march, Lahore, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that National Women's Day in Pakistan commemorates a 1983 march against a law that devalued the testimony of Pakistani women to half that of men? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Women's Day (Pakistan). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1983 women's march, Lahore), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	We may not agree on everything, but goddamn I respect you. NebulaOblongata (talk) 15:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

NotForum

Bookku once again I ask you to read WP:NOTFORUM and not make comments on talk page Talk:2022 Muhammad remarks controversy unless it is about specific improvements to the article. From Here on I will be simply ignoring all mentions comments that are not directly related to improvement of a specific line/para of the article. Venkat TL (talk) 05:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

"note all my comments are always for betterment of respective articles", How is asking you to be clear and precise in your article talk page comments a bad faith accusation? Venkat TL (talk) 06:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ibtissam Bouachrine

Hello, Bookku,

Thank you for creating Ibtissam Bouachrine.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi I’m just reviewing Ibtissam Bouachrine. She doesn’t look to me like she passes WP:NPROF. She may pass WP:AUTHOR but you’d need to find multiple reviews of her work to show that. Thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 06:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Email

Hello, Bookku. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

To the email sender,

• * I am just a student of South Asian studies beyond that I have not shared any other personal information and you are not expected to draw personal inferences. One is not expected to infer and discuss user's personal identities unless particularly shared, that amounts to breach of Wikipedia policies.

• Though I do have progressive POVs towards skepticism and women's rights, for your kind information, to best of myself I respect and maintain reasonable editorial neutrality as a responsible member of Wikipedia community. I have written on women's rights in global perspectives then I have touched on US, France, India too and not just Pakistan.

• Wikipedia content writing is credible sources based, gets balanced over a period of time through content contribution and curation from various Wikipedians.

• Content (addition and deletion) related concerns can be discussed at relevant talk pages of the articles.

• One can submit grammar and copy edit requests @ WP:GOCE.

As per Wikipedia Email policy; there are some important "best practices" about Email facility – Wikipedia is designed to work based upon public dialog, hence you are requested to communicate only on-wiki itself.

Thanks,

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 07:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Talk page discussions

Hello Bookku. You could generate more interest from other editors in your posts if you follow the advice of WP:TPYES, "Be concise: Long posts risk being ignored or misunderstood. [...] If you really need to make a detailed, point-by-point post, see [the other] tips." In my opinion it would be good if you start by separating the subsections you created in Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault Edit dif 1104699210. Make them separate threads and give them a title more descriptive, although concise, of the content. Thinker78 (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Public Space

Further shenanigans will lead to a thread at AE. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

RegentsPark (comment) 17:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

@RegentsPark Through you I would like request the user who approached you, a kind WP:Goodfaith and avoidance of personalizing content disagreement. On WP I have been always reasonably civil and polite. I do not engage in revert wars. I do not personalize issues and just focus on resolving content disagreement on respective talk pages as per WP policies and processes to the best extent I understand.

Some users may have disagreement here and there, which might need talk page discussions focused on content disagreement resolution but most of my content is reasonably sourced. At times some users have had reservations about tone and grammar of some content but usually that is residual effect of sticking around what original source, same time to get out of copyright grammar may be slightly compromised at times. To address these two issues on my own I keep sending copy edit help requests to other users in neutral manner,at times delays too happen, but most times I do get the help, .

I do have progressive POVs and also I am a skeptic (as note on my user page), so it is usual for me to take encyclopedic note of dogmatism and related criticism. Same time I am an inclusivist so wherever possible and sources are available I do take note of even conservative views, or at least put a template on own requesting expansion of the section for conservative opinions or opinions which I have not covered.

I am student of South Asian studies so good amount of focus is around South Asian topics but I have been consistent in doing global coverage as time permits. I have been taking up feminist an women's rights issues in India and Pakistan both and also global. Similarly superstition related issues I have taken for every dogma. Only that some of my drafts got deleted due to six month limitation, I shall revive those as I get time to update them. (If not in big way at least in smaller way I have helped even religious articles of all religions constructively, though I am not fan of dogmatic religiosities. Also, at least in my small ways, I have helped users of diverse South Asian and global background without discriminating)

One problem with superstition related articles is definition of superstition in main article is not getting stabilized. Again in many smaller human communities information sources may be limited. Where better standard of sources are there I give preference to them.

Last but not least I give detail replies to keep record straight, as I have written this reply, but again I am criticized for length of reply, wherever possible I do provide briefs or synopsis of my own replies to avoid inconvenience of users.

After saying all above I am a human after all and my have my limitations, I am respectful and reasonably open to suggestions. Please feel free to suggest. I will also come back to you for your valuable guidance.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Bookku. Thank you. USaamo ^(t@lk) 14:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fundamentalism, radicalisation and terrorism in nordic countries

Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fundamentalism, radicalisation and terrorism in nordic countries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Civil life in conflict zones

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Civil life in conflict zones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Amina Dawood Al-Mufti

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amina Dawood Al-Mufti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

topic banned from any references to the intersection of Pakistan and Feminism broadly construed

You have been sanctioned per this discussion on WP:AE

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. RegentsPark (comment) 22:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Bookku, to clarify the above in case there is any confusion, you only need avoid editing where Pakistan and feminism intersect. Feminism elsewhere (India, etc.) is fine. Pakistan on non-feminism topics is fine. Avoid anything gender related and Pakistan and you'll be good.--RegentsPark (comment) 15:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Discussion notification: Clarification regarding details of your ban

Hi Bookku,

If I see correctly, you are currently affected by a ban. In the description of the ban, a restriction is described that appears to prohibit you from appealing the ban earlier than six months.

I have noticed this restriction (six months before appealing) at WP:AELOG/2022. As I'm uncertain about whether such a restriction may be made at all, I have asked for advice at WP:ARCA#Clarification_request:_Appeal_restrictions_as_part_of_discretionary_sanctions.

If you agree with what is being said there, I think you can safely ignore this notification. If the arbitrators decide that the restriction is lifted, you'll be notified separately. You are welcome to provide an own statement too, though.

If you can't edit the page, please have a look at the instruction box at the top of the page for an e-mail option.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Change regarding a previous sanction

Following a clarification request regarding appeal restrictions as part of discretionary sanctions, a sanction placed against you has been amended to remove a previous restriction regarding your ability to appeal. The archived request can be viewed here.
For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aroosa Alam

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aroosa Alam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

@Bruxton Many thanks and Lot of good wishes for happy holidays to you, to all Wikipedians reading this and happy editing Bookku (talk) 07:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Irrational beliefs

Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irrational beliefs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Circassian women

Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Circassian women, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pawri Ho Rahi Hai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Criticism of Edward Said's Orientalism

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Criticism of Edward Said's Orientalism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Slavery in Mecca and Medina

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slavery in Mecca and Medina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hermeneutics of feminism in Sikhism

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hermeneutics of feminism in Sikhism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Love in Pakistan

Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Love in Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

draft:aurat

hi i wanted to inform to that aurat does not mean women in sorani kurdish Gerçois (talk) 12:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@Gerçois Please help me understand, According to you 'afret' or 'Afrat' word is not used in Sorani Kurdish or it means some thing else? If it means women then what is etymology of word 'afret' according to you? What are linguist opinions about etymology of 'afret'?

Please also see Wikt:ئافرەت the English Wiktionary has references besides I have used reference in the article. And as far as I remember I had tried to contact Sorani Kurdish users.

I am not likely to update the draft as of now but I will keep in mind our discussions whenever I will update that one. Actually I am waiting for expert in Persian language of 8th and 9th century AD, if you know any one you can help . Bookku (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm a native sorani speaker as far as i know women is jin or gin in Sorani I will try to ask if ئافرەت(afrat) my family if it exists in sorani

as for an expert in Persian language of 8th and 9th century AD Unfortunately, I don't know any expert Gerçois (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@Gerçois Please do ask your family members (preferably from previous older generation) and also try to get some information from professor of linguistics in middle eastern languages from near by college if possible.

My impression about Kurdish languages issues is all the countries where it is spoken have tried to assimilate Kurdish people by playing down their linguistic culture. Already many local languages vocabulary is getting lost due to increased usage of bigger international languages. Hence I request to check with older generation and college professors.

i do not want to prove what is not there in Sorani Kurdish and I am not in hurry to bring that draft in main article space. You take your time for proper search and keep me informed. Thanks for your constructive communication, look forward to further feedback as and when possible to you. Bookku (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I will ask my mother

it is true that all the countries where it is spoken have tried to assimilate Kurdish people by playing down their linguistic culture Gerçois (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Ohh my god I'm so sorry I didn't sleep very much last night I Just thought about it afret is women jin is wife I'm sorry my brain wasn't thinking right Gerçois (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@Gerçois Sorry if you were so surprised. Just I checked one January 2015 research paper co-authored by 'Ergin Öpengin' (Probably who now works with University of Kurdistan). It states ".. The adjectival meanings associated with the forms jin or afret (both ‘woman’) are diametrically opposed to those of pyaw .."

• Gender in Kurdish : Structural and socio-cultural dimensions DOI:10.1075/impact.36.10hai PDF Available for download @ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283061456_Gender_in_Kurdish_Structural_and_socio-cultural_dimensions
• https://ukh.academia.edu/ErginOpengin

Bookku (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

thanks for the pdf will look into it 👍 Gerçois (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Ursula Barry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ursula Barry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Love in Pakistan

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Love in Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fundamentalism, radicalisation and terrorism in nordic countries

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fundamentalism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muslim and Islamic Feminism in India

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muslim and Islamic Feminism in India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Expressions of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Women through media interactions

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Expressions of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Women through media interactions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

AFD participation

Hi Bookku, I don't agree with your evaluation in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pullman Flatiron Building, but I appreciate your participating there and reasoning with guidelines. A suggestion, if you're in more AFDs: if you're making a comment without voting, start off with "*Comment" (without the double quote marks). If you're making a "not-vote" (also known as "!vote", which is a vote, really, but an AFD is not a majority voting process), then start off with one specific choice using a standard term such as "*Keep" or "*Merge" or "*Redirect" or "*Delete". If you start off that way, then you can later see how you are doing in AFDs, or at least how well your !votes matched up to final results, using the wp:AFDSTATS tool. For example, see how I am doing recently, which currently shows me making some votes on the diagonal, e.g. 17 recent "keep" votes where the articles were indeed kept, and also some !votes off the diagonal, e.g. one where I chose "merge" yet the result was "keep". The report applied to your username does show your !voting in 8 recent AFDs. But it doesn't show a !vote for you in the not-yet-finished Pullman Flatiron Building one because your !vote is not formatted in a way that the program can read.

Anyhow, I am glad you are here and participating. cheers, --Doncram (talk,contribs) 16:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

@Doncram: WP is encyclopedia and IMO decisions should largely based on rationality and not democratic pressure. Hence my participation in most discussions is limited to comment without expectation of vote getting counted. I try to share rationals upto my understanding, club (i.e. add) in long duration to my list and use for relevant policy improvement discussions in due course of time. I am much less interested in vote getting counted either way. Still thanks for your helpful friendly message, quite a few things I was unaware of, those I will take note and try to improve upon. Happy ediring and cheers Bookku (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Great, it seems to me that you do understand how decisions are supposed to work here. Yes, your comments giving reasoning are helpful, whether or not you put in a "!vote". And some persons dislike the AFD scoring system and other counting systems because they could contribute to editors trying too hard just to get good scores. I do find it helpful though to go back and see my past !votes in AFDs. I am more proud of having had a significant effect in many AFD discussions (where the !voting was going one way, then I came in and commented and it seemed my views influenced other editors and changed the final outcome) than I am about having a good "score". Changing others' opinions is not tallied up by the wp:AFDSTATS tool.

Also, for what it's worth, I am considered an "inclusionist" rather than a "deletionist" here, are you familiar with those terms yet? You can see see that in the AFDSTATS for me, here is report on my last 500 AFDs. I simply am more interested in participating in AFDs where it seems to me that an article can and should be saved. Oh i see on your User page that you consider yourself to be an Exopedian....i don't think I've heard of that before. Oh, hmm, maybe you prefer to be cold and aloof, while my posting here is perhaps too warm and friendly for your taste! Sorry if I might have bothered you! --Doncram (talk,contribs) 18:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

@Doncram Sorry for such a delayed reply. When I read, your above comment I smiled and kept quiet for brevity and avoidance of argument.

As an Exopedian certainly I prefer to give precedence to ".. the philosophy of focusing on the encyclopedic side of Wikipedia (articles and related content) .." and less of WP:DRAMA

What you missed is first sentence on my user page which says "Friendly inclusive in me expects far more travelers in the endless journey of encyclopedic endeavors, .."

I am also very much inclusivist in WP terms. Once in a while I participate in discussions beyond political or religious polarized drama since I believe we can discuss non-polarized topics more calmly. Referring to calm non-polarized discussions in policy discussions may help better neutrality.

Why I made a point to reply is the last sentence in your observations ".. while my posting here is perhaps too warm and friendly for your taste! .." who writes like this? :) Bookku (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

On side note looking for some help in expansion of the article Appeal to accomplishment if the topic is found to be interesting one . Bookku (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Notice

This is a long article, and it may take a long time. (loading speed is so slow!) The person who loves reading (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice

Please double check the article to make sure there's no other issues because I found relatively low grammar mistakes. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

If you're not satisfied, you can change the "Done" to "Partly Done" on the request page. Thanks! The person who loves reading (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked?

The only UTRS ticket I saw for your username was in Sept. What message do you receive? Can you copy it here? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies: can you see anything useful? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:17, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Deepfriedokra, is it still worth looking? Drmies (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies: Thanks. I guess it's fixed now. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

This time I could not complete the process of UTRS since the form kept UTRS form continued showing error saying IP address is not mentioned even after I mentioned the IP address given in the blocking notice. Idk why did that happen. Bookku (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You edited yesterday, but what block message do you get when you try to edit? Can you copy the message here? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

UTRS message was similar to the like one in previous i.e Sept. I can not copy paste now probably since time to lapse the block was around - initially I thought you only unblocked me on request.

I was all the way confused since initially I thought I made some unknown mistake while signing in mentorship. :)

What I need to do so the same problem does not recur again to me? Bookku (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You've been editing today, so you are not blocked. If you find yourself auto-blocked again, copy the block notice and place it on your talk page with an unblock request. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure, many thanks Bookku (talk) 11:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Holism on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Allies of World War II on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Two-nation theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:William L. Breckinridge on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arvind Kejriwal on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Humor during the COVID-19 pandemic

Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Humor during the COVID-19 pandemic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)