Averagetennesseejoe

See also sections

Hello,

Just as a general rule, an article shouldn't be linked in a "See also" section if it is already linked elsewhere in the body or navigation boxes. Those sections are mainly for relevant topics that don't neatly fit elsewhere in the article body. BrineStans (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. Averagetennesseejoe (talk) 04:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Murder of Blair Adams

I added some standard article stuff. You might try and find at least two other sources discussing the case, including one that is non-local, to firmly establish WP:Notability. BrineStans (talk) 15:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, thanks for creating Grainger High School. Can you please add your sources? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Blair Adams

Hi. Adding pictures to articles is difficult due to copyright violations and stuff, would be difficult to add one for this article but I don't believe it's really needed. Best thing would be to add more details of the murder and case and if possible more sources, the more the better really. Inexpiable (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 375

I reverted a couple of your edits on said page. The southern terminus is not in Ruteldge. Yes it my be in Rutledge's zip code, but it's in the community of Cherokee, Tennessee. Please don't change it. Thank you. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Request of exemption to IP Address blockage.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Averagetennesseejoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because (My IP address was used by a member of my family who I want to remain unknown, going by as user named Swagmaster002 and yet another user ATennesseean, even though is not correct grammar, created a account on my house’s IP address. My family has had a conversation with the family member and he is no longer available to use Wikipedia for any purpose. I however, was not responsible for his acts, as I tried to undo everything he could but he would not stop, so his misbehavior cause my IP Address to be blocked indefinitely while I had no purpose in this attack on the article of Rockwood, Tennessee. I condemn the behavior of my relative, and I sincerely apologize for his ridiculous and absurd actions. So if you can please, I would like an exemption from the block on my IP address. If it is denied, I will accept the denial and not object to it.) Averagetennesseejoe (talk) 04:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Technically indistinguishable to Swagmaster002 and ATennesseean. All using the same phone and looking at a timeline, used by the same person. The userpage of this account has the same sentence that was put on one of the sock's userpage the day before.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Grainger High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grainger High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grainger High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tater Valley, Tennessee

The article Tater Valley, Tennessee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Place does not meet GNG, GNIS reference is not of populated place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 16:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)