User talk page for User:Archimerged.

This is where you complain about my edits....

Articles to edit

edit

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_energy_topics does not seem to mention heat engines

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Free_energy_suppression does not mention sense of "Free energy" as solar energy which happens to be difficult to extract or as ambient temperature differences

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Energy_carrier does not mention heat pipes (?), compressed air

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Future_energy_development does not mention heat engines, ocean gradient (which has an article... OTEC ocean thermal energy conversion)

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Energies_per_unit_mass needs work

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Green_energy does not mention heat engines...

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Distributed_energy needs work

Lack of a T-S diagram for the Stirling cycle

edit

The Heat engine article has a "Thermodynamic cycles" template box, which has an item labeled "Stirling cycle" but it goes to the Stirling engine article. There is no T-S diagram shown for the Stirling cycle.

Renewable Energy Design; Development and Sustainability

edit

Cool. Just checked and saw your edit - thanks for contributing. It's not an area I know much about at all, but of course that's the point of sharing our knowledge...

There are also two separate appropriate technology wikis on other sites:

I'm working on an argument, at User:Singkong2005/Wikis, for merging the three wikis. Comments appreciated. Once I've clarified my thoughts, and the arguments, I'll post a link on those wikis and hopefully get some constructive discussion and decisions.

Cheers --Singkong2005 08:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

High-frequency dielectric constant

edit

Hi Archimerged, I love your plot of   and   vs frequency (this one) which is included in Permittivity#Complex permittivity. In my opinion there is not enough in WP:Permittivity and WP:Relative permittivity articles about the high-frequency dielectric constant.....

Anyway, I was wondering if you know where   goes in that plot..... Also, as I understand,   is the same as  ? And I talked to my prof the other day and, it seems   should actually be taken to be the one at the optical frequencies? But I'm not really sure? Do you know? And, if so it would be great to actually label   on that nice plot of yours on the   curve.....

Cheers, Blue.painting (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply