Allthemilescombined1

Welcome!

Hi Allthemilescombined1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you help review the block that was placed for copyright violations? I have made over 500 edits, all in good faith, bringing a significant contribution with only a tiny percentage of minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Allthemilescombined1! Your additions to Coagulation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for adding sources to other statements in the article! Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you please help review the block that was placed for copyright violations? I have made over 500 edits, all in good faith, bringing a significant contribution with only a tiny percentage of minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Your edit to Clinical pathology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to the article Crossword. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

I've found better sources for some of the things you added: New York Times and the New Yorker. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 10:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Minor Edits

Thanks for your recent edits; I can see you've been busy. You've been marking your edits as minor, but in many cases they're not. An edit should only be marked as minor if it's as trivial as a typo fix. It shouldn't be used when adding or removing references, content or templates. There's guidance at Help:Minor edit if you need. Cheers, AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 15:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. Minor in the scope of the universe, but not minor in the rules of this community. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you help me contest the block I received for copyright violations? I've made over 500 edits, they've all been in good faith, and I've contributed substantially to the project with what I think are a tiny percentage of very minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

further July 2024 copyright issues

Your edit to Blood transfusion has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you please explain why this edit was considered a violation? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

This "please explain" response appears to completely ignore the post below where Diannaa sets out a clear explanation of your copyright violation, providing some comparison using bold formatting of the text that you added against the copyrighted text recently published by Elselvier in a journal article about Allogenic Cord Blood Transfusion in Preterm Infants. Drchriswilliams (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transient myeloproliferative disease, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ERG and GATA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Who Are the Jews—And Who Can We Become?

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Who Are the Jews—And Who Can We Become? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jps.org/books/who-are-the-jews/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 02:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Hematology. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Allthemilescombined1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have made over 500 good-faith edits and all of my work is in good faith. Please see my answers to the questions. :What is copyright? Copyright is the legal right to publish and otherwise use creative material and to authorize others to use the material. :· How is Wikipedia licenced? Under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). :· Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Copyrighted content can only be legally published by the copyright holder or those authorized by the copyright holder. :· Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? If the writer has said that anyone can copy these things and make changes to them. :· How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? I will explain material in my own words.Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This misses WP:FAIRUSE but is otherwise pretty good. But I'm deeply, deeply concerned by your comments below. Given your statements below, you clearly don't understand the problems yet. Yamla (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

These answers are pretty accurate, but you were only blocked for 20 minutes before you posted your unblock request. Why should we trust you now? What's changed? — Diannaa (talk) 00:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa. Please explain what material in my edits violated the copyright policy. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

The policy says that unblock requests will be reviewed by an administrator other than the one who placed the block. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Here are two examples that are clear violations of our copyright policy. Matching content is marked in Bold:

On blood transfusion you added this:

In neonates, repeated RBC transfusions may lead to displacement of fetal hemoglobin by adult hemoglobin, which can contribute to hyperoxia at the cellular level. Transfusing preterm neonates with RBC concentrates obtained from umbilical blood is a strategy to increase hemoglobin concentration without depleting the physiologic HbF reservoir.

Source says:

Repeated red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in preterm neonates cause the progressive displacement of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) by adult hemoglobin. The ensuing increase of oxygen delivery may result at the cellular level in a dangerous condition of hyperoxia, explaining the association between low-HbF levels and retinopathy of prematurity or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Transfusing preterm neonates with RBC concentrates obtained from allogeneic umbilical blood is a strategy to increase hemoglobin concentration without depleting the physiologic HbF reservoir.

On hematology, you added this:

First defined by the American Society of Hematology in 2015, systems-based hematology includes initiatives to deliver high-quality, evidence-based, cost-effective care to patients with blood disorders, through efforts to:

• improve stewardship in the diagnosis and management of complex blood disorders, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombophilia
• develop programs to promote appropriate use of blood products, inferior vena cava filters, anticoagulants and other hematologic therapies
• improve for accessing hematologic expertise through electronic consultation and disorder-specific care pathways

Source says:

First defined by the American Society of Hematology in 2015, the idea of a systems-based hematologist arose from evolving pressures in the health care system and increasing recognition of opportunities to optimize the quality and cost effectiveness of hematologic care. ... including efforts to improve stewardship in the diagnosis and management of complex hematologic disorders (eg, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombophilias), the development of programs to promote appropriate use of hematologic therapies (eg, blood products, inferior vena cava filters, and anticoagulation), changes in care delivery infrastructure to improve access to hematologic expertise (eg, electronic consultation and disorder-specific care pathways) ...

The section that says "deliver high-quality, evidence-based, cost-effective care to patients with blood disorders" (marked in green) is copied from here. — Diannaa (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. How can we send to another admin to judge whether the block is upheld? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

You are listed in Category:Requests for unblock, which certain admins regularly patrol. But currently you are more likely to get your unblock request declined than accepted, because in spite of your good answers to my questions, your subsequent question "Please explain what material in my edits violated the copyright policy" shows that you don't actually understand what you did wrong. — Diannaa (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I believe the American Society of Hematology wants to raise awareness of the new field of systems-based hematology. I could request their permission. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

It's a lot more than that. You can't just ask them for permission to post something here. They have to irrevocably grant the release of rights to the source material for others to use under a suitable free license. That's a far bigger deal and I suspect from this reply that you really need to read WP:COPYREQ because this is important, too. And it has to be something at the American Society of Hematology that has the right to sign away the organization's exclusive rights to their content, which almost certainly means you'll need to engage with their legal team. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you for the clarification. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Allthemilescombined1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand now. I didn't think closely paraphrasing a very small percentage of the material I covered (less than 0.1%) would justify a permanent ban, when I contributed substantial improvements to the Wikipedia community by editing numerous articles that were significantly out of date, and in some cases had glaring errors. I regret that I paraphrased those scant few sentences and will do my very best to make sure I never make careless errors again, using extreme care at all times. Thank you for adding administrative review so I could get a broader perspective.Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You now have an adequate understandiong of how copyright applies to Wikipedia, and have made a commitment to not copy from your sources any more. — Diannaa (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)}}

@WhatamIdoing: Hi would you mind taking a look at my block, since you thanked me for an edit in the past? Thank youAllthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Diannaa here. Sorry, I am not going to unblock you at this time, and other admins are highly unlikely to do so either, especially without asking me, the blocking admin. You did have some good answers to my questions but your later question "Please explain what material in my edits violated the copyright policy" leads me to believe that you don't actually understand what you did wrong, and I therefore can't trust that you will not continue. Also, you seem to be of the opinion that because you have also made some good edits that it's okay to break the copyright policy. It's never okay, even for people who have been here for years and have thousands of good edits.

Here are some thoughts: Content has to be written in your own words and not include any wording from the source material (short properly attributed quotations are allowed, but cannot be used as a substitute for writing your own content). One thing I find that works for me is to read over the source material and then pretend I am verbally describing the topic to a friend in my own words. Stuff should also be presented in a different order where possible. Summarize rather than paraphrase, and don't try to include every single detail. This will typically result in your version being much shorter than the source document. It also helps to have more than one source to draw from.

Here are some things I want you to do: There's some reading material on this topic at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing; if you could especially pay attention to the section "How to write acceptable content". You could have a look at the material at Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words. Check out the links in the menu on the left for some exercises to try. Or study this module aimed at WikiEd students (This one might be the best one for you to work through). Once you have done that, and changed your mind that it's okay to break the rules just a little bit because you've also made some good edits, please post here again and tell me what you've learned. — Diannaa (talk) 01:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I have read the modules at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words, and Plagiarism - Wiki Education Dashboard. I agree that it’s not okay to break the rules, regardless of my hundreds of ‘clean’ edits. I have learned from my mistakes. I will be extremely stringent to a level beyond my previous level of care. Thank you for directing me to these resources. I have learned that:

best practice when utilizing a source includes taking notes of concepts, not phrases;

these notes should be recorded after putting down the source, in order to think over what was read;

multiple sources should be considered before combining the notes into a draft;

it’s important to return to each source before submitting the draft, to make sure close paraphrasing has not occurred;

and if flagged for close paraphrasing, best practice is to rewrite the material in your own words and then add it back.

Other points I have learned are that:

for a file to be considered free under Wikipedia's Image use policy, the license must permit both commercial reuse and derivative works;

free files should be used when possible, but if no free file exists, it is sometimes permissible to use a file under the "fair use" provision;

Wikipedia has chosen a narrower limitation and exception from copyright than fair use;

most free files should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia, to allow them to be used for other Wikimedia projects in addition to Wikipedia;

17 U.S. Code § 512 describes limitations on liability relating to material online;

Commons does not allow fair use material; and non-free content can be used on the English Wikipedia if 10 conditions are met: 1) there is no free equivalent 2) its use respects the commercial market role of the original material; 3) it is used to a minimal extent; 4) it has been published previously; 5) it meets Wikipedia content standards and is encyclopedic; 6) if it is an image, it is either personally owned, freely licensed, public domain or otherwise conforms to certain specifications; 7) it is used in at least one article; 8) its presence is needed for readers to understand the article’s topic; 9) it is used in an article’s namespace; and 10) the source is identified in a way that helps determine its market value, with a copyright tag and clear rationale for non-free use. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to work through some of this material. I am now unblocking your account, and will be monitoring your contribs for a while. — Diannaa (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JEWels: Teasing Out the Poetry in Jewish Humor and Storytelling has been accepted

JEWels: Teasing Out the Poetry in Jewish Humor and Storytelling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, can you please help remove the editing block that was placed on me? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)@Asilvering:Thank you, can you please help remove the editing block that was placed on me?Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, sorry for ignoring you - I never got a ping for this message for some reason and only just noticed it now. I see you got your block sorted out in the meantime. I came here to ask if you had any particular reason for still using AfC. Were you asked to use it as a condition for your unblock? I don't see any editing restrictions or partial blocks associated with your account. -- asilvering (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message! I was so flummoxed by that block that I'm trying to run everything by someone more experienced. I don't want to make mistakes or overstep my authority. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Don't worry about running things past someone more experienced - if you move an article to mainspace yourself or directly create it there, a member of WP:NPP will be by to check it. They'll allow you to make mistakes (so will AfC reviewers), but they do check for any big problems. If you really do prefer to use AfC, we won't stop you, but (imo, as an AfC reviewer) that's just putting your drafts in avoidable limbo. -- asilvering (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

(And, if you think you're about to make a mistake, my suggestion would be to ask someone directly, rather than hoping an AfC reviewer will catch it - WP:TEA would be a good place to ask that kind of question.) -- asilvering (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for this advice, I appreciate it. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't know how to move my pending AfC submissions to mainspace. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I would leave any you've already submitted in for now, since most people who move their AfC drafts to mainspace are trying to evade the attention of reviewers, so doing that is a good way to start off on a real bad foot with the new page patrollers. But the next time you start a draft, you don't need to apply the AfC tags if you don't want to. Or, if you are going to make a full new article all in one edit and don't need to work on a draft for a while, you can simply start them in mainspace in the first place. -- asilvering (talk) 01:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ask Me Again has been accepted

Ask Me Again, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artis Henderson (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Artis Henderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Allthemilescombined1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. When her new book comes out in 2025, I'll look for reviews in major outlets. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on "Ask Me Again" at AFC (h/t the Teahouse). Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Is it appropriate to add to this article that a commenter on IMDb wrote "I keep my old VCR just so I can re-watch this" in 2020? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

No. IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because it's a wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bouchier (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Bouchier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Artis Henderson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Artis Henderson. Thanks! Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate your help! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, Allthemilescombined1, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us along with writers and physicians. You might find it useful to look through our Primer for guidance on women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfC notification: Draft:Rayne Rouce has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rayne Rouce. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayne Rouce (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rayne Rouce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel-Ryan Spaulding (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel-Ryan Spaulding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracy Schorn (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracy Schorn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Beckerman (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Beckerman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Beckerman (musicologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Beckerman (musicologist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Appreciate your comment, this is helpful. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)