67.79.54.130

Boardies

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Boardies, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Andrius 12:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Hagerman^(talk) 02:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

June 07 edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Hiberniantears 21:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] / edg ☺ ★ 01:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Drowning has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. DougsTech (talk) 00:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Moses, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 07:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Theodore Roosevelt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH PANDA^talk 01:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

More than "unconstructive" your attempt to make your personal political/social/historical statement on Theodore Roosevelt constitutes clear vandalism. If you don't like the guy for many possible reasons, then say so in the discussion page, and not by just trying to replace the entire article with one childish line. You have to have more brains than that and to understand that this kind of prank would not be allowed. If any of the regular editors, such as myself see it, we will work to have you banned by IP address and other mechanisms from vandalizing the article. If you want to discuss Roosevelt here or elsewhere, that's fine too. I've read dozens of books about the man and many of them are highly critical of him going back to the first scholarly work by Pringle in the 1930s which sought to demythologize him and certainly did knock TR down in the popular estimate. So share with me, just what particular aspects of this man that you don't like? I take it that you see him as some reactionary facist capitalist or whatnot? Hope to hear something positive from you. Thanks and regards. SimonATL (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Placebo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --RedHillian | Talk 05:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Aaron constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --RedHillian | Talk 05:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Frozen bovine semen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 05:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Frozen bovine semen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 06:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Frozen bovine semen. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Frozen bovine semen. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 06:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to University of Mary Hardin-Baylor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  – iridescent 22:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to University of Mary Hardin-Baylor constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RunningOnBrains 22:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during February 16 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to University_of_Mary_Hardin-Baylor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Erik9 (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page McKinley Tariff has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 07:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Texas at Austin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: University of Texas at Austin was changed by 67.79.54.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-26T01:06:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page University of Texas at Austin. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Texas A&M University. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Texas A&M University. ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Looney Tunes, you will be blocked from editing. Hmrox (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brain fart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cybercobra (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Timothy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Symphony no. 4 Allegro Vivace

A tag has been placed on Talk:Symphony no. 4 Allegro Vivace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Necromancy, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

• Click here to automatically generate a false positive report.
• Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 06:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Frozen bovine semen. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Justice Society of America, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

• Click here to automatically generate a false positive report.
• Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 01:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Mary Hardin–Baylor, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Jncraton (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at André 3000. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Sreejith K (talk) 15:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Humour, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 06:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nihilism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Karenjc 20:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Nihilism constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Karenjc 20:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nihilism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Noom _talk ^contribs 20:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beauty pageant, you may be blocked from editing. Kiwi128 (talk) 06:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and some issues were found because of which it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Krone. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 01:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New Deal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alief Elsik High School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Seaphoto^Talk 23:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toby Love. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Luke (Talk) 00:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American Southwest Conference, you may be blocked from editing. -- Luke (Talk) 00:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to American Southwest Conference. ~NerdyScienceDude 13:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greer A. Kendall. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 10:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lysol with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Frozen4322 : Chat 04:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lysol with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Frozen4322 : Chat 05:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Drayton McLane, Jr. with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Calabe1992 01:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pomeranian (dog). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm Moe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Slavery at common law because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dramatism because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Negima! Magister Negi Magi, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Seaphoto^Talk 07:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm Vrenator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Depurination, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Vrenator ^talk 15:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Krone concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Krone, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Patrick Krone

Hello 67.79.54.130. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Patrick Krone.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Krone}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at L'incoronazione di Poppea, you may be blocked from editing. Bencherlite^Talk 01:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Belarus. Seaphoto^Talk 04:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dean Ambrose. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 05:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Live Free or Die, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Hello, I'm Oxfordwang. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sideburns seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oxfordwang (talk) 17:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Katie Morgan  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

April 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Birth control. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TL22 (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milo Ventimiglia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukichigai (talk • contribs)

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fat tax has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Help me!

Please help me with...how to edit an outdated number in the initial description of our university on its main page (University of Mary Hardin-Baylor)

67.79.54.130 (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

If you have a reliable source that verifies the change you want to make, simply edit the page, change the number, and add the reference to the page (or state where you got the information in the edit summary). If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belton, Texas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Katie^talk 02:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---