July 2024
editHello, I'm CFA. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Liberty Village, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 💬 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Why would it need a reference? Is there a reference for the claim of men and women walking down the street? 65.93.101.75 (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, actually. The reference attached to that claim (https://web.archive.org/web/20230307104849/http://www.urbancentre.utoronto.ca/pdfs/researchbulletins/CUCSRB32-WieditzJan07.pdf) reads:
- "Both the Mercer Reformatory and the Central Prison faced onto Liberty Street, so it was the first street women or men would set foot on after serving their sentences in the correctional facilities."
- Wikipedia is based on reliable sources. If reliable sources don't state a claim, then it is original research which isn't allowed. Please see Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. C F A 💬 21:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- But there were nonbinary people too, taking away from that is LGBTQ+ erasure. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, if you have a source that states that, feel free to include it. C F A 💬 22:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that nonbinary people did not exist back then? I don't understand. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- No. I've said multiple times that Wikipedia is based on what reliable, secondary sources say. The reference cited said "it was the first street women or men would set foot on". If you have a reference to support your claim, feel free to edit the article to include it. Anything else is original research and synthesis. If you have any other questions, the Teahouse is always open. C F A 💬 14:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes but what about Wikipedia's inclusivity policy? Some of these articles are woefully out of date with modern science and understandings and need to be rewritten. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah... and you can rewrite them... with citations to reliable sources. C F A 💬 16:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is generally understood that sources back then were ignorant to modern gender science. Does that not make them unreliable then? 65.93.101.75 (talk) 10:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, it does not. Regardless, that paper was only published in 2007. C F A 💬 16:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is generally understood that sources back then were ignorant to modern gender science. Does that not make them unreliable then? 65.93.101.75 (talk) 10:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah... and you can rewrite them... with citations to reliable sources. C F A 💬 16:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes but what about Wikipedia's inclusivity policy? Some of these articles are woefully out of date with modern science and understandings and need to be rewritten. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- No. I've said multiple times that Wikipedia is based on what reliable, secondary sources say. The reference cited said "it was the first street women or men would set foot on". If you have a reference to support your claim, feel free to edit the article to include it. Anything else is original research and synthesis. If you have any other questions, the Teahouse is always open. C F A 💬 14:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that nonbinary people did not exist back then? I don't understand. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, if you have a source that states that, feel free to include it. C F A 💬 22:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- But there were nonbinary people too, taking away from that is LGBTQ+ erasure. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, actually. The reference attached to that claim (https://web.archive.org/web/20230307104849/http://www.urbancentre.utoronto.ca/pdfs/researchbulletins/CUCSRB32-WieditzJan07.pdf) reads:
August 2024
editHello, I'm Shazback. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dave Matthews Band Chicago River incident have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Shazback (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Shazback. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dave Matthews Band Chicago River incident, you may be blocked from editing. Skyshiftertalk 22:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dave Matthews Band Chicago River incident. Skyshiftertalk 09:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry I did not mean to. Please forgive me, just adding what I heard. I am originally from Somalia and this is all new to me. 65.93.101.75 (talk) 09:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |