2601AC47

Userboxes This user was editing Wikipedia without a registered account for a long time before they created one. In an emergency, this user may be slapped with a trout. 1This user refuses to apply the adjective "unique" to anything that is not the only one of its kind! Beware! This user is a known WikiJaguar. This user thinks you can learn a lot by editing an Encyclopedia. This user helped promote Dr Disrespect to good article status. This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues. This user participates in WikiProject Film. This user is a participant in WikiProject Video games. This user believes that laughter is a medicine that should be taken several times a day!!! ohh yeah bay- shamelessly stolen from JPxG because... SelloutThis user watches the Super Bowl for the ads. This user is interested in sociology. This user HATES winter. This user contributes to Wikipedia on a Chromebook. This user never tries to kill time as they can always find productive things to do that occupy them Even Jimbo (the founder) knows how to make a appearance when you ask him. In fact, alongside Beeswaxcandle, Cwmhiraeth, CzechOut, Doc James, Heddy, Nacaru, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, SirBlaze, ThunderingTyphoons, Vermont and Xaosflux, I stalk and judicature their talk pages, and altogether, wish to form a dream jury. This user drinks tea. This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for improvement. This user is a member of WikiProject Cleanup. This user assists at the dispute resolution noticeboard. This user believes that we should do no harm on any biographical article. This user volunteers at the Wikipedia Help Desk. This user believes that the universe began with a big bang when God said, Let there be light. This user is a native of the Americas.

---

My signature (for authenticity): 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon
How I would pronounce (IPA-like): [Twɛntiˈsɪks-oʊ-wʌn-eɪ̯-si-fɔɹtiˈsɛvn̩]

For other people named 2601:, see [[:Special:ListUsers?username=2601:]].

#SaveBlinx (and wait for a 3rd game, hopefully by 2027 or sooner) Also, I have exactly 430 pages on my watchlist; specifically, 5 categories, 12 WPs, 14 users (counting me) and 399 articles (counting 4 potential SB LIX teams, temporarily until Feb 10).

---

In order of whether I care about it:

· [Pages relating to the Shakespeare authorship question; remembered?]

MAIL ME ONLY IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY URGENT AND YOU HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE... AND IF I'M WATCHING STRANGER THINGS, PLAYING FORTNITE OR I'M BUSY IN REAL-LIFE ELSEWHERE.

Your GA nomination of Dr Disrespect

The article Dr Disrespect you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dr Disrespect and Talk:Dr Disrespect/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 14:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Your revert of revision 1259389166

I sincerely believe your revert to be erroneous. The image that I replaced the previous image with is visually identical; it solely differs in its file format. In fact, I was performing a non-free reduction that was requested on A Minecraft Movie poster.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rossel44 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

I see. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 22:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Elli (talk | contribs) 02:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I promise to be careful with this power. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 02:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dr Disrespect

The article Dr Disrespect you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dr Disrespect for comments about the article, and Talk:Dr Disrespect/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent warnings

I have reverted your warnings to AceSevenFive (talk · contribs) and 135.12.162.209 (talk · contribs) because I believe they were inappropriate and an "only warning" template is no small thing.

Could you explain what disruptive behaviour you believe both users to have engaged in?

In the case of the IP user, you cited their edit to the DRN - but that edit was to post what appears to be a perfectly legitimate request for dispute resolution. In the case of AceSevenFive, you didn't cite anything specific, and I can see nothing disruptive in their recent edit history, much less anything that would warrant telling them they "may be blocked from editing without further warning". AntiDionysius (talk) 19:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

A minute case of downright disbelief over it. It just seems off that they would go straight to DRN instead of, say, BLPN. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with going to DRN; it's an option presented to editors in the case of content disputes. I personally think it would be better if they went to BLPN because the case would likely get resolved quicker, sure, but picking DRN - especially if you're an IP user who might not understand the significance of BLP or know BLP exists - is okay and definitely not evidence of bad faith, let alone "only warning" territory.

What did AceSevenFive do? AntiDionysius (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

As a help desk watcher, I didn't know until the IP came in. I checked both users and the article talk out. And in ASF's case, I got tipped early signs of sealioning. Again, I got sort of disillusioned. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Avraham Shapira

Maybe the next two links will change your mind about the undo. thanks! User talk:Techiya1925, [1]. 132.71.108.188 (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

(hmm...) Well, I would start by reading our policies and guidelines, and especially our Manual of Style. I'd also create an account and use a sandbox.

Moreover, I've put in the contentious topic alert because, while he doesn't seem to fall under it... Let's just say that what he did relates at least a little to it. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 14:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

So why did you return the edits to the article? I honestly don't understand. Do you think they follow the policy? Or you just think you should always cancel edits without an account?.. 132.71.108.188 (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

I think this explanatory essay may help clarify that one. FYI, I use Ultraviolet, an open source counter-vandalism user script. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

🤭 "Edit summaries, always a good practice, are particularly important when reverting. Provide a valid and informative explanation including, if possible, a link to the Wikipedia principle you believe justifies the reversion"... 132.71.108.188 (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Uh-huh, I did. And right after, I used UV to send the reminder that your edit was reverted. Not exactly meant to embarrass, if you will. So here are another 2 things to note: how to reach consensus and resolve disputes. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

😕 132.71.108.188 (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Two more come to mind than: First, know that you're kind of subject to disputes, and secondly, either try to get it resolved at the talk page or get some help from members of WikiProject Religion. Just remember: be bold, but not reckless. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 16:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

And WikiProject Judaism, if inclined. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 16:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

A message from 84.229.179.242

Hi, I edited Yossi Beilin's page and you deleted as there was no reference. I have the photo of the honorary degree he received. How can I enter it? Thanks 84.229.179.242 (talk) 09:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Since you’re a IP, obviously you can’t upload images like that on here (or Commons) unless you register. However, about that “honorary degree”: First, do you have a reliable source for the image of it, secondly, does it meet our guidelines on such images? And thirdly, and I say this gently (some others would not), be aware of the fact that he falls under one of our contentious topics. That’s also a good reason for me not to go farther unless absolutely needed. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 23:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Dr Disrespect

On 13 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dr Disrespect, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dr Disrespect's first videos featured a bombastic "champion" trash-talking game-play footage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dr Disrespect. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dr Disrespect), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Uhhh… Yay. But that was not the line I proposed (Do look at the DYK nomination again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 00:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

And it's forever archived. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 00:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

An award for you!

		The Deletion to Quality Award
		For your contributions to bring Dr Disrespect (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr DisRespect) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 11:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. For the record, though, my work on it started well after it was established that he is notable (and initially while anon). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 12:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

+rollback

Hi 2601AC47,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
• Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
• Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
• Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
• If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Academy Awards

Hi there, could you explain a revert reason in Academy Awards. 'World of' doesn't fit it, what does it mean? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Let me just say that "excellence in the world of film industry" could not really make sense and that just "excellence in the film industry" is better in describing the purpose of the awards. Yes, the world, I assumed, refers to the industry worldwide and not just in the US; but historically and more broadly, it is usually just the industry in general. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 02:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taylor Lorenz on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)