AfD nomination of Coverage details of Google Maps

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Coverage details of Google Maps. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage details of Google Maps. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Barber's pole, did not appear to be constructive and was reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 01:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barber's pole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Opelio (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Barber's pole. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (Talk) 04:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Barber's pole. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talkcontribs) 13:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Catherine King (politician) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Catherine King (politician) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/catherinekingmp) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

April 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Andreasmperu. An edit that you recently made to Iron Man 3 seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andreasm just talk to me 03:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Iron Man 3. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Andreasm just talk to me 04:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Smart key— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Waggie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chinese Cinderella— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waggie (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kieran Ault-Connell

edit

Thanks for your message, but please see my edit summary there. For any private info about this you can email me at grahamwp gmail.com. Graham87 06:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Greg Jennett, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Murray Olds, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply