Welcome!

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~). Happy editing!

Moonraker (talk) 21:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hari Singh Nalwa, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SH 18:50, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hari Singh Nalwa. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SH 18:50, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Hari Singh Nalwa, you may be blocked from editing. SH 18:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Sitush. ScottSteiner 00:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please stop vandalising Bhagat Singh

edit

This is to warn you to stop vandalising the article on Bhagat Singh. Tinpisa (talk) 08:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

While I do not consider your edits to be vandalism, they are disruptive and contrary to our policies regarding verifiability and use of reliable sources. For example, you have made equally poor contributions at Hari Singh Nalwa. What is worse is that as well as harassing other editors you are also engaging in widespread edit warring. Please can you desist from this type of behaviour: it is not sufficient to say what you know in Wikipedia articles - you can only say that which is verifiable and the burden is on you to get that right. If you find that people disagree with you then please discuss the matter civilly on the relevant article talk pages and please respect the consensus that results from such discussions. - Sitush (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

vandalism are you mad, bhagat singh was born in arya samajist family i am not claiming this, it is well known fact.122.161.78.118 (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I specifically said that I am not accusing you of vandalism. But, yet again, I refer you to WP:V. What you know is utterly irrelevant here unless it is verifiable, and it is quite clear that many of your changes are proving to be contentious and as such you really must come up with some reliable sources. - Sitush (talk) 10:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Muhammad Ali Jinnah

edit

Please can you explain this edit. - Sitush (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk page behaviour

edit

If you continue in your current vein, posting uncivil and disruptive diatribes to talk pages such as Talk:Hari Singh Nalwa then I will seek administrator review. Please tone down your language, stop insulting people and stop SHOUTING. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply