Template talk:Final Fantasy VII chronology

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic Request for Comment - Template's Existence

Request for Comment - Template's Existence

edit

Big question - should this template really have been spared from deletion in a recent discussion? Some editors raised what they thought was valid points, and the nominator withdrew on the belief that was the case. But I am not certain they were justified, and that the nominator withdrew the discussion too soon. What do you think:

  • YES
  • NO

GUtt01 (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GUtt01: you're asking to revise the consensus that was just established under a week ago. I recommend this brought up in WT:VG.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
This isn't a suitable RfC. Even though a withdrawal isn't strictly speaking suitable for a nomination where there is a delete !vote; inciting an RfC over whether it should be closed or not is not suitable. I recommend opening a discussion at WT:VG and discussing the template. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply