Template:Did you know nominations/Virgin Atlantic Little Red

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SSTflyer 16:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Virgin Atlantic Little Red

edit

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 12:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Core criteria checked per above template. Earwig's tool shows 2% chance of copyvio. Article is GTG for DYK. However, for pity's sake, please rewrite the source sentence to something less awkward. Try something like, "Aviation giant British Airways' dominance of the market and Virgin Atlantic's restricted use of its few landing slots were responsible for the demise of Little Red."Georgejdorner (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

  • The C of E, it occurs to me that the word "dominated" is a word commonly used in business affairs, which tends to give the hook deception away. How about substituting "monstered"? Gatoclass (talk) 10:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Well I originally wanted to used squashed, if you agree maybe we can use squashed instead of dominated. The Royal C (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)