- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Taryatu-Chulutu
edit
Terkhiin Tsagaan Lake
- ... that an eruption of Taryatu-Chulutu about 2980 BCE formed the Terkhiin Tsagaan Lake (pictured)?
- ALT1: ... that an eruption of Taryatu-Chulutu in the Holocene formed the Terkhiin Tsagaan Lake (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Tony Munro
Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 15:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC).
. The article is new (moved to article place on 26 June) and long enough. It is interesting and cites sources with inline citation. No close paraphrasing, copyvio was detected. Hook is interesting and verified by an inline citation. My concern is that the date is not a fact, but only one of the multiple estimations (if my understanding is correct) and it is verified by a source different from the source which verifies the main "message" of the hook (=the lake was formed by the eruption). I suggest the date should be deleted.Borsoka (talk) 04:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)- @Borsoka: I've proposed an ALT hook.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of geology.
For me, the article does not say that the eruption that formed the lake ocurred in the Holocene.Borsoka (talk) 12:32, 27 June 2016 (UTC)- Now it does say, take note that Mongol place names have variable spelling.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of geology.
