Template:Did you know nominations/Star Wars Episode VIII

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Star Wars Episode VIII

(

)

... that despite returning of all stars from the previous film, Star Wars Episode VIII is also starring "a handful of new cast members"?

Reviewed: ~~Soon.~~ Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

Moved to mainspace by Captain Assassin! (talk), AdamDeanHall (talk), and Favre1fan93 (talk). Nominated by Captain Assassin! (talk) at 03:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC).

I wouldn't quite say "all stars" are returning right now since R2-D2 is getting a new voice and it isn't (yet) confirmed whether Han Solo will be in this installment. Try something else. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Comment Honestly, I personally wouldn't have nominated this for a DYK at this time because there really isn't any "hook worthy" material in the article to use. But if we do want to proceed with this, I'd suggest a hook based on the block quote from Johnson or something to do with Skellig Michael. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

I thought something about the early Skellig Michael shooting would be fine. The original hook doesn't seem much like a hook anyway. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree, and am perfectly fine with something regarding the shooting process. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Let's try this: ALT: "... that, beyond shooting at Pinewood Studios and on Skellig Michael, additional filming for Star Wars Episode VIII will take place in Mexico?" - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Much better. Hook is adequately referenced, neutral, and definitely more interesting than the original hook. Article was moved to mainspace within the past 48 hours, and is long enough. QPQ has also been provided. Now we're good to go. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)