- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Rodwell-Hoskins mechanism
- Reviewed: Fundadores de São Paulo
- Comment: I was thinking of dropping the "may be" in favour of "is" but that would need a second opinion from someone who understands climate.
Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 11:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC).
- Since the first sentence says it's a hypothesis, better stick with "may be". Impressive work! Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new enough, long enough and extensively sourced. Hook is interesting and cited in the article. No plagiarism detected on Earwig (some false positives though). I added ALT1, which is the same information but the wording is flipped around. qpq is done so this nom's ready. BuySomeApples (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- ALT1 works for me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:25, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
ALT1 to
T:DYK/P6
Article is new enough, long enough and extensively sourced. Hook is interesting and cited in the article. No plagiarism detected on Earwig (some false positives though). I added ALT1, which is the same information but the wording is flipped around. qpq is done so this nom's ready. BuySomeApples (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)