- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
République
edit- ... that Ryan Payton created République to prove that a "real game" can be made for mobile phones?
Created/expanded by Axem Titanium (talk). Self nom at 20:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Hook is fine. Article is long enough and referenced, but the orphan tag and all the bare URLs still need to be fixed for this to be passed. I don't think you need a QPQ review since your talk page says you only have DYKs. What a pro (talk, contribs) thinks that ohhhh, ohhh, woaaah-oh-oh-ohhhhh. 06:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I'm not sure what to do with the orphan tag, since this is such a new game. I could start adding it to lists like List of iOS games, or something, if that would help? Bare urls fixed. What do you mean by "since your talk page says you only have DYKs"? Axem Titanium (talk) 20:38, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oops – I left out a "four" before the "DYKS". And I think adding it to a bunch of lists would help. What a pro (talk, contribs) thinks that ohhhh, ohhh, woaaah-oh-oh-ohhhhh. 01:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, a QPQ is owed; there is a fifth DYK on the most recent archive of the talk page. All the freebies have been used up, so this nomination does indeed require a quid pro quo review. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Done. I didn't even know about that <5 rule, as I have been QPQ reviewing for all my DYK noms. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- This article is good to go, then.What a pro (talk, contribs) thinks that ohhhh, ohhh, woaaah-oh-oh-ohhhhh. 17:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Adding the tick so people can easily tell that this is indeed "good to go". BlueMoonset (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, guys! Axem Titanium (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
