Template:Did you know nominations/Okawachi Pumped Storage Power Station

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sst✈(discuss) 16:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Okawachi Pumped Storage Power Station

edit
Okawachi station's upper reservoir
Okawachi station's upper reservoir

Created by Ita140188 (talk). Nominated by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) at 03:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC).

  • The Squirrel Conspiracy Article length and date of posting are ok but the fourth paragraph is not referenced. Pl fix reference so that I can verify the text. The hook is interesting, cited and verified. QPQ done.Nvvchar. 04:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I added references for the fourth paragraph, and rephrased a sentence which was not very clear. Unfortunately I could only find references in Japanese for the old plants.--Ita140188 (talk) 08:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • . Article is now full referenced and text verified. There is no copy vio and text is neutral. Img is freely licensed. Good to go.Nvvchar. 02:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Is there any way to write a hook that isn't so repetitive? Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the Okawachi Power Station is one of the largest pumped-storage hydroelectric power plants in Japan?
Yoninah: I don't speak Japanese, but when I ran the title through Google Translate, it actually came out as "Okochi power plant", so I think we can get away with removing "Pumped Storage" from the bold link. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Restoring tick per Nvvchar's review. Do you think we can get away with renaming the article altogether? Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the updated hook. The title of the article however follows the title convention for these kinds of plants, regardless how they are defined in their original language. I dont think it should be changed. In every country these power stations have different "official" names but I think it's more clear to have a consistent naming rule in the english wikipedia.--Ita140188 (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks for the explanation. Yoninah (talk) 11:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)