Template:Did you know nominations/Odontomachus pseudobauri
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Odontomachus pseudobauri
edit
Odontomachus pseudobauri head
- ... that the extinct ant Odontomachus pseudobauri (pictured) was bought from an amber dealer in Basel, Switzerland? Source: "A. (accession in this paper)(Fig. 2) purchased in Basel by Cesare Baroni Urbani from Mrs. Edith Bloch of the "The Amber Collection" of Puerto Plata" (DeAndrade, 1994 pg. 3)
- Reviewed: Corella eumyota
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 04:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC).
- Add "extinct" before the "ant" in the hook to make it more interesting. Volunteer Marek 02:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is appropriately licensed, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. These two sentences don't seem to be quite right, but I haven't got access to the source to check them out. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- ".. the chewing margin of the right mandible having 14 teeth, while there are 13 teeth in the right."
- "The third through end segments of the gaster are shrunken and missing."
- @Cwmhiraeth: Mandible sentence corrected to 13 teeth on the left. The gaster sentence is correct, the fossil is missing the rear half of the abdomen.--Kevmin § 14:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
OK. On further thoughts, I can understand "third through end", but it could be more clearly expressed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
