Template:Did you know nominations/Noel T. Keen

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Noel T. Keen

edit

Moved to mainspace by Chris troutman (talk). Self nominated at 20:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC).

@Chris troutman: This needs a full review, but I've struck ALT1 because it's not supported by the reference in the article, which also needs to be amended. I'd suggest ALT4:
Relentlessly (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I really like the quirkiness of ALT2, and tweaked it slightly. ALT2 hook refs verified and cited inline. ALT1/ALT4 is all right, but the article doesn't mention that Ruth Allen was a plant pathologist. If you wish to use that hook, please mention it and cite it inline. Yoninah (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • @Relentlessly: you added the fact that she's a plant pathologist, but didn't reference it. This would generally be a minor issue, but since the hook is saying the award is named after her and she was a plant pathologist, this connection needs to be cited. Even her article doesn't reference the fact that she's a plant pathologist. Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • OK. The cite says it without "saying" it (kind of like what we do to avoid close paraphrasing) :) ALT4 hook ref verified and cited inline. Both ALT2 and ALT4 are good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)