Template:Did you know nominations/Need for Speed Unbound

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Need for Speed Unbound

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Need for Speed Unbound will have a much different art style than previous entries, making use of elements such as graffiti and cel-shading? Source: https://www.engadget.com/need-for-speed-unbound-release-date-trailer-174505124.html
  • ALT1: ... that the title for Need for Speed Unbound was accidentally revealed early on Electronic Arts' website? Source: https://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/need-for-speed-unbound-leak/
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nom (someone suggested I do one). I'm told that since I have fewer that 5 DYKs I'm exempt from the QPQ requirement. Would it be preferable that I do one anyways?

Created by Blaze Wolf (talk). Self-nominated at 23:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC).

• @Blaze Wolf: I've fixed some typos in your hooks. dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 01:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• Article was created within the past seven days; exceeds requirement of 1500 characters of prose; neutral (no promotion, inserting opinions, controversy etc.); photo doesn't violate copyright according to its page history; hook is under 200 characters; reliable sources used; the reason you don't need to do a QPQ is because there is a program that keeps track of them, so anyone with less than 5 wouldn't be counted, pretty much. Trillfendi (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• Ya I was told it's so newbies to DYK can get used to the process before diving into reviewing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• @Trillfendi: So is it approved or am I waiting for someone else to review it? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• @Blaze Wolf: Given I found this in Template talk: Did you know/Approved, I'm assuming it's approved.