- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mini mum
- ... that Mini mum is very small? Source: Scherz, Mark D.; Hutter, Carl R.; Rakotoarison, Andolalao; Riemann, Jana C.; Rödel, Mark-Oliver; Ndriantsoa, Serge H.; Glos, Julian; Hyde Roberts, Sam; Crottini, Angelica; Vences, Miguel & Glaw, Frank (27 March 2019). "Morphological and ecological convergence at the lower size limit for vertebrates highlighted by five new miniaturised microhylid frog species from three different Madagascan genera"
- ALT1: ... that Mini mum is miniscule, but not Mini scule? Source: Scherz, Mark D.; Hutter, Carl R.; Rakotoarison, Andolalao; Riemann, Jana C.; Rödel, Mark-Oliver; Ndriantsoa, Serge H.; Glos, Julian; Hyde Roberts, Sam; Crottini, Angelica; Vences, Miguel & Glaw, Frank (27 March 2019). "Morphological and ecological convergence at the lower size limit for vertebrates highlighted by five new miniaturised microhylid frog species from three different Madagascan genera"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Eyabi Okie
5x expanded by AryKun (talk). Self-nominated at 15:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC).
Hi AryKun, fun article, review follows: 5x expansion confirmed from 22 October; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I din't find any issue with overly close paraphrasing in a random check on the sourcing; hooks are really fun and check out to the article and the source (in so much that the frog is small); a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
