Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Haʻaheo Atcherley

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Mary Haʻaheo Atcherley

(

)

Mary Haʻaheo Atcherley

... Mary Haʻaheo Atcherley (pictured) was allowed to be a 1920 candidate for a seat in the senate of the Territory of Hawaii, but legally prevented until 1922 from holding the office if she had won?

Apple, Russ and Peg (1971-10-06). "This Day in Our Hawaiian Heritage". Honolulu Star-Bulletin. p. 23. Retrieved 2020-08-04.

October 6, 1920 - "Mary Haʻaheo Atcherley ... successfully ran in the primaries ... The secretary of Hawaii is not vested with authority or discretion to omit from the official ballot the name of any duly nominated candidate even though it should be conceded that such candidate is not eligible for election to the office for which he or she is a candidate."

"Suit to Determine Right of Women to Seek Office Advised". The Maui News. 1920-10-08. p. 8. ISSN 8750-457X. Retrieved 2020-08-04.

"There is no doubt in the mind of Attorney General Harry Erwin that the 19th amendment to the Constitution, while it gives women the right to vote does not give them the right to hold public office."

"Women of Hawaii Eligible to Seat in Legislature". The Maui news. 1922-09-01. p. 1. ISSN 8750-457X. Retrieved 2020-08-04.

"Bill Passed by House in June Passes Senate and Is In President's Hand; Settles Moot Issue"

Reviewed: Hui Aloha ʻĀina

Created by Thellomerca (talk). Nominated by Maile66 (talk) at 14:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC).

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Well sourced, no neutrality problems, no grammar or spelling problems, and a really interesting hook. I notice that you made this during the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/174 which I am also working on. Really good work with this one. Jon698 talk 6:01, 6 August 2020