- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kelsey Piper
- ... that journalist Kelsey Piper sees her Vox column as a way to popularize discussion of global catastrophic risk? Source: Can journalists still write about important things?
- Reviewed: N/A, <5 DYKs
Created by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 08:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC).
- Just a comment: Your hook links to a disambiguation page, which is probably not intended. You should pipe the link to the specific vox article you are referring to. --LordPeterII (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching that! Fixed. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 10:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- see below
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
@Vaticidalprophet: Great work on this page. The only issue I can see is that reference 6 has an unreliable-source tag, which should probably be fixed per WP:DYKSG#D6. Once that's resolved, the nomination is good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, @Epicgenius! It should be good now. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Vaticidalprophet: No problem, should be good to go then.
Epicgenius (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Vaticidalprophet: No problem, should be good to go then.