- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Kelihos botnet
edit- ... that the Kelihos botnet was once capable of sending 4 billion spam emails a day?
Created/expanded by Excirial (talk). Self nom at 16:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed Cowleaze Wood
- If possible, i would like to ask the reviewer to glance over the text for grammar issues. As a non/native English speaker my grammar is a tad off at times. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hook: Short enough, fair grammar, interesting, cited
- Article: New enough, long enough. I've fixed some grammar, but another copyedit would be useful. Referencing is fairly thorough, but the last sentence of #Botnet Structure, operations and spread needs a reference. This reference, footnote B, fails verification (January 2012 not there, Kelihos.b not there). Paraphrasing checks against this source fine.
- Summary:
Interesting article, needs a bit of reference work (one missing reference and a double check that the sources support the information). Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the thorough check, i appreciate it. The last sentence should now be properly sourced, and Kelihos.b is now sourced as well (It seems that its reference got moved around while writing). Added a few extra citations here and there, especially for the DYK hook itself. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 11:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This looks good to go now, as far as DYK is concerned. You're very welcome. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
