Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Elizabeth Manning James

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Jane Elizabeth Manning James

edit
(
)

Created/expanded by Alexislynn(BYU) (talk). Self-nominated at 22:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • ✓ This article was Listed as a Good Article on 01:54, 10 August 2016
    • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 12677 characters
    • ✗ Paragraphs [15] (A ... reads:) in this article lack a citation.
    • ✗ This article has the following issues:
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 54.8% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello, AlexisLynn isn't active on Wikipedia right now, so I can address the bot's concerns. The uncited paragraph quotes the plaque depicted in the article. The copyright concerns come from sourced quotes in the article. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed by human reviewer. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
  • This is a newly-promoted GA and meets the length and newness criteria. I have added ALT1 which has the same facts but I think is more understandable. The hook facts are cited, the article is neutral and I did not detect any policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Cwmhiraeth, what are the issues that called for a ? icon? If the only issue is that you wrote the ALT1 hook, which contains the added "Mormon pioneer" fact, then what this really needs is an "again" icon to attract a new reviewer. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Agreed, I had the wrong icon. New reviewer needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I can essentially confirm Cwmhiraeth's review: article became a GA within the requisite timeframe, free of copyvios that I can find (admittedly most of the sources are offline): the bot is only flagging quotes. Neutral, well cited, etc. I prefer ALT1, which is in the article and cited; AGF on the source. I have not previously come across an image being used for article text, but I think we can AGF on the fact that it is actually the gravestone of the subject. Vanamonde (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Jane_Elizabeth_Manning_James&oldid=739521115"