Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Trinity Church, Kamianets-Podilskyi
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Holy Trinity Church, Kamianets-Podilskyi
edit- ... that the Holy Trinity Church was the oldest church in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine until it was destroyed by the Soviets in 1935?
Created/expanded by DDima (talk). Self nom at 04:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Article is long enough and the date checks out. Where is the source for the hook? -SusanLesch (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I have adapted the text a bit to reflect the source I used. A book I have on the city lists the church's destruction as occurring in 1935 and provided a source for that as well. Unfortunately there is no online version and the book is in Ukrainian as well. --ddima (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- The book you have would be preferable because "1935" does not appear in here. Or does it? -SusanLesch (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well the link I sourced is a translation of a text printed in 1901, and the church was destroyed in 1935. Anyway, if it helps I can post a picture of the page? To be clear, I rechecked and the book states "They took away the square's original name, while twelve years later the church was (removed) from the face of the earth." -- a pretty literal translation of what I am reading right now.. --ddima (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- As long as your source says 1935, we're fine. But you have to give that source in the article, at the point of the hook. Thank you if you can please cite it. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry I was looking at a cached old copy. It looks just fine now. Thanks for your changes. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- As long as your source says 1935, we're fine. But you have to give that source in the article, at the point of the hook. Thank you if you can please cite it. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for your help with this. --ddima (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well the link I sourced is a translation of a text printed in 1901, and the church was destroyed in 1935. Anyway, if it helps I can post a picture of the page? To be clear, I rechecked and the book states "They took away the square's original name, while twelve years later the church was (removed) from the face of the earth." -- a pretty literal translation of what I am reading right now.. --ddima (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- The book you have would be preferable because "1935" does not appear in here. Or does it? -SusanLesch (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hook and date check out, source accepted in good faith. Ready to go! -SusanLesch (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
