Template:Did you know nominations/Graham technique

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Graham technique

edit
  • ALT1:(if that's too shamelessly clickbaity) ... that when a dancer's spine "contracts" in Graham technique, it should actually get longer?
  • Comment: A badly overdue article on (probably) the most important school of modern dance—comparable to Cubism for its revolutionary effects. WP's coverage of dance is quite spotty overall, and I hope things like this will attract eyes and editors.

Created by FourViolas (talk). Self nominated at 19:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, long enough (2502 B of readable prose) and written neutrally. Inline citations are used and no close paraphrasing was detected. Both hooks are formatted correctly, are interesting, cited within the article, and neutral (if racy). Nominator is exempt from QPQ. gobonobo + c 02:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)