Template:Did you know nominations/Gaga (genus)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Gaga (genus)

edit

5x expanded by IndianBio (talk), Casliber (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 15:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC).

  • 5x expansion, new enough, the hook is interesting and verified by the cited sources. QPQ done. I did however notice some close paraphrasing issues. For example, the sentence "During the performance Gaga wore a heart-shaped Armani Prive' costume with giant shoulders that according to Pryer, looked similar to the bisexual reproductive stage of the ferns, called a gametophyte" in the wiki article is very close to the "For example, in her performance at the 2010 Grammy Awards, Lady Gaga wore a heart-shaped Armani Prive' costume with giant shoulders that looked, to Pryer's trained eyes, exactly like the bisexual reproductive stage of the ferns, called a gametophyte" of the cited source. It wouldn't hurt to go through the article a bit more thoroughly and distance it from the source. Otherwise it seems fine. Yakikaki (talk) 08:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks Yakikaki, I am copy editing the article now. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Great, give me a ping when you want me to take another look :) Yakikaki (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
  • @Yakikaki: one help please, is there any tool where I can check for the paraphrasing issue? I want to clean it totally. Anyways I have given it a thorough copy edit now. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  • @IndianBio: Sure, I use this one: [1] Thanks for the editing! I'll look it through tomorrow. Cheers, Yakikaki (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Looks much better now, good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 15:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)