- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Fault zone hydrogeology
Layers of clay deformed by seismic activity can block the flow of fluid underground.
Moved to mainspace by Shloscar (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 03:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
A very interesting article about something I've been interested by recently. I will certainly be keeping this article in my bookmarks for later... jp×g 10:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Numerous paragraphs lack any citations, per WP:DYKSG#D2. The article also has an orphan tag. Also, please lowercase the second and succeeding words in the subheads per MOS. Yoninah (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Which ones? The only paragraphs I can find that don't have inlines are #1 and #3 in
§Fault type effects
, which seem to me like they're supported by the subsequent paragraphs (the choice of line breaks in that section being arbitrary, and one of the unreferenced paragraphs being a single sentence). Did I miss something? jp×g 21:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. #1 could be said to be an introduction, but there are too many facts in #2 that lack a cite. Generally, when you break a paragraph, you should add a cite at the end. Yoninah (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I deorphaned it and fixed the section headings, but the article author is going to have to fix those paragraphs, since I don't have access to all the sources they used (nor am I sure of which sources that text is from). jp×g 21:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like the page creator has made sure that all paragraphs have at least one citation. Restoring tick per JPxG's review. Yoninah (talk) 00:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
A very interesting article about something I've been interested by recently. I will certainly be keeping this article in my bookmarks for later... jp×g 10:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
