Template:Did you know nominations/Concavodonta

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Concavodonta

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a fossil of Concavodonta described in 1843 has been lost?

• Reviewed: Lonicera fragrantissima
• Comment: See page 62 of Tunnicliff, 1982

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 02:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

• Article length and date verified. But I can't seem to find where it says the specimen was lost in the source. Yazan (talk) 03:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

• in the type material section of the species description "Portlock's type specimen remains untraced." --Kevmin § 04:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

• Apologies, I missed that. Good to go! Yazan (talk) 04:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)