Template:Did you know nominations/Clitocybe albirhiza

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Clitocybe albirhiza, Floccularia albolanaripes, Geopora cooperi, Hygrophorus goetzii, Hygrophorus marzuolus, Hygrophorus purpurascens, Lentinellus montanus, Ramaria magnipes, Tricholoma vernaticum, Snowbank fungus

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• Clitocybe albirhiza
• Floccularia albolanaripes
• Geopora cooperi
• Hygrophorus goetzii
• Hygrophorus marzuolus
• Hygrophorus purpurascens
• Lentinellus montanus
• Ramaria magnipes
• Tricholoma vernaticum
• Snowbank fungus

)

• ... that Clitocybe albirhiza, Floccularia albolanaripes, Geopora cooperi, Hygrophorus goetzii (pictured), H. marzuolus, H. purpurascens, Lentinellus montanus, Ramaria magnipes and Tricholoma vernaticum are snowbank mushrooms?

• Reviewed: Fury of the Congo, James Young (1762–1833), Black Mike Winage, Lawrence H. Johnston, Watt Sam, Nancy Raven, Algo Henderson, Supplicia canum, Tattooed Serpent, Epicauta vittata

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nominated at 20:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC).

• If this could be held off for a day or two before reviewing, I will expand the snowbank fungus article as well. Sasata (talk) 20:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• Last article expanded, now ready for review. Sasata (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

• Reviewing--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
• I count 10 articles in the hook and 9 QPQs.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

• Added another QPQ. Sasata (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• 4 were created on September 12, 5 were expanded beginning September 12 and 1 was expanded starting September 17. All are long enough or sufficient expansions.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
• The first 8 all have text that supports the hook. Tricholoma vernaticum does not have the term snowbank in its article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

• I have now rectified this omission. Sasata (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• Oddly, 1 (Hygrophorus goetzii) uses the term in the WP:LEAD. It would seem that either all or none should.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

• At some time in the future these will all be expanded and submitted to GAN, and made consistent in this way, but I don't think it's a major concern before then. Sasata (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• • This is also the only one that has an only source to verify. Source clearly supports the hook. WP:AGF on all other species citations.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
• Snowbank fungus does not need a source to support the hook and is adequately sourced to support its own notability.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review. Sasata (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• All set now.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)