- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Chrysina limbata
Chrysina limbata
5x expanded by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 22:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
Overall: Article 5x expansion confirmed. Passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Minor edit, as Chrysina limbata "is" not being referred to as the color, rather the beetle "has" a reflective color, otherwise nom good to go. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)