- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Caproni Ca.60
edit
- ... that the Caproni Ca.60 Transaereo eight-engine, nine-wing flying boat prototype (pictured) was intended to become a 100-passenger transatlantic airliner, but crashed on its second flight?
5x expanded by MLWatts (talk). Self nominated at 13:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC).
I remember this from Miyazaki's animated film The Wind Rises. Long enough article, for sure, and a well-referenced article. A good hook. The image is free of copyright restrictions. QPQ exempt. A few problems:
- This was not a move to mainspace, it was an expansion of an article that was created in 2006.
- The expansion began on 6 January, not 11 January, however, the nomination occurred on 11 January, so that's ok but the nomination should be refiled under 6 January.
- There are several spelling and grammar issues throughout the article. These need to be fixed.
- FunkyCanute (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for reviewing my clumsy nomination (sorry, I'm not very experienced). My comments about the problems you noticed:
- I expanded the article in my sandbox and copy-pasted (rather than actually moved) the updated content to the mainspace on January 8... so I wasn't sure whether to call this a move or an expansion. I made the correction, however.
- I think the point above implies that the fivefold expansion took place on January 8, so the filing is correct... or am I missing something?
- I'm aware of the grammar issues, unfortunately I'm not an English native speaker and I can't do better than this; someone else should try to improve that aspect if possible. (I'll try to fix the spelling mistakes on my own).
- Thank you! Cheers, --M.L.WattsWatts up? 16:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
This is now good to go. The issues have been clarified or fixed. AGF for offline citation. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
