- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination's issues has not been fixed, and has two template tags. Closing as unsuccessful.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Amou Haji
- ... that Amou Haji died at 94, after washing for the first time since more than 50 years? Source: https://www.corriere.it/cronache/22_ottobre_25/uomo-piu-sporco-mondo-morto-94-anni-dopo-essere-tornato-lavarsi-c6590964-546b-11ed-a58a-ad027d5a5146.shtml
- Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/Dangers of the Mail
- Comment:
Will do the QPQ later.
Done
5x expanded by Dr Salvus (talk). Self-nominated at 22:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC).
I suppose work is still being done to the page and I'll come round and complete the review in the near future, but right now it seems in need of much cleanup (stilted grammar, choppy sentences, typos, downright strange expressions like "he was repeatedly immortalised smoking a cigarette five or six times" (???)). Reads like a bunch of random news clippings lumped together to pass off as an "encyclopedic entry". Let me know when it's actually ready for review. Cheers, Kingoflettuce (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Kingoflettuce, please review it again. Dr Salvus 22:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies for the tardy follow-up, but I'm afraid that the same criticism of the article looking like a bunch of news items cobbled together still applies (some chunks copied verbatim according to Earwig). Too much extraneous info - see WP:NOTNEWS! The nominator's recent "gaming the system" fiasco elsewhere (which also revolved around issues of copyediting/redundant info) doesn't exactly inspire confidence either. Cheers, Kingoflettuce (talk) 07:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Kingoflettuce, there was not bad faith here. Dr Salvus 08:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless, something needs to be done about how this article currently reads. Kingoflettuce (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
If the article issues can't be addressed then there is no path forward for the nomination anymore. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 17:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
