Template:Did you know nominations/Air Algérie Flight 2208

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Air Algérie Flight 2208's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Air Algérie Flight 2208

edit

An Air Algérie Lockheed L-100 Hercules similar to the one involved in the accident

Created by Jetstreamer (talk). Self nom at 00:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Not sure if saying the pilot's skill was the reason the plane avoided a highly-populated area, but it's acceptable. Other than that, length, date, sourcing and QPQ all check out. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't see the hook fact anywhere in the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
That's because the article was modified. I'm providing an alternative hook below:
ALT1 ... that an Algerian cargo aircraft that crashed in Northern Italy in 2006 did so in the surroundings of highly-populated areas but led to the fatalities of the three occupants on board only?

--Jetstreamer Talk 11:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

  • ALT 1 approved, tick based on previous review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I think the ALT1 hook is oddly worded: "in the surroundings of highly populated areas"? What does that even mean? Something along the lines of "did so near a highly populated area but only killed the three crew members?" is clearer and more direct. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
*ALT2: ... that an Algerian cargo aircraft crashed in a highly-populated areas in Northern Italy but killed only the three occupants on board? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Almost there. Minor grammatical issues, plus I think "occupants" and "on board" are a bit redundant together. I've called that one ALT2; here's ALT3:
  • ALT3: ... that an Algerian cargo aircraft crashed near a highly populated area of Northern Italy but killed only the three crew members on board? —BlueMoonset (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Less wording, even better. Thanks. BTW, I've crossed out the two previous ALTs.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)