- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
6th Missouri Infantry (Confederate)
Moved to mainspace by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 02:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
A good regimental article which covers the origins, organisation, main battle honours and significant operations during the ACW well. New enough, long enough and well sourced. The hooks are cited and are taken in good faith. Certainly the details check out against Sifakis who gives a brief synopsis. I think this is good to go; I would marginally prefer ALT1 to the main hook, but either is fine. Bermicourt (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: We're close to July 1; would you like ALT1 to run on that day? Yoninah (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: That would be fine with me, if it's not too much of a hassle. Hog Farm (talk) 23:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
A good regimental article which covers the origins, organisation, main battle honours and significant operations during the ACW well. New enough, long enough and well sourced. The hooks are cited and are taken in good faith. Certainly the details check out against Sifakis who gives a brief synopsis. I think this is good to go; I would marginally prefer ALT1 to the main hook, but either is fine. Bermicourt (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)