- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
501(h) election
edit- ... that the 501(h) election allows many U.S. non-profit organizations to engage in unlimited lobbying as long as they do it cheaply?
- Source: "Since the spending limitations are based solely on dollars spent, a [501(h)] election is quite favorable to any charity that can engage in “cheap” lobbying, for example on the Web or using volunteers.... The ability to use the Internet to influence the public (and perhaps Congress as well) on legislative matters renders the dollar limitations imposed by the Expenditure Test useless in many cases." [1], p. 781
Created by Antony-22 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC).
New within past seven days as of nomination. Article greatly exceeds the 1500 character of prose requirement. Passes Earwig's copyvio detector; what text that is copied is quoted and attributed, rather than just taken. The article is neutral in tone, and decently sourced. Hook is well beneath 200 characters (132, including "..."). Hook is sourced. Level of interest should be decent; 501c3 status is of interest to a broad enough base, I think. QPQ easily satisfied [2][3][4] and more. The two images on the article are free license with no problems. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
