Talk:Yumeshima Station

Japan: Trains Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:59, November 17, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Trains in Japan descendant WikiProject.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

A fact from Yumeshima Station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the extension to the Yumeshima Station was originally supposed to be opened in 2008 for when the Osaka Olympics was being bid for?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yumeshima Station.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by JuniperChill talk 19:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the extension to the Yumeshima Station was originally supposed to be opened in 2008 for when the Osaka Olympics was being bidded for?

Source: https://www.obayashi.co.jp/thinking/detail/project82.html

Reviewed:

Created by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC).Reply

ALT1: ... that Yumeshima Station is scheduled to open in 2025, even though it was first planned to be opened in 2008?

Just an idea for the nominator (I will not be the reviewer). Bremps... 06:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

Great work! Going to WP:AGF here on the Japanese sources, but running them through a translator seems to support the claims being made in the article. Partial as well to ALT1 as being less dated and more interesting if the nominator is open to it, but I think the article otherwise is good to go. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 16:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic