Talk:Yugo-nostalgia

Yugo-nostalgia's Support Numbers?

I'm a little skeptical to the real widespread support of Yugo-nostalgia. None of the all major political parties in the former Yugoslav republics, even those who reformed from the old Communists, openly call for the reunification of Yugoslavia, and those who do gather only around 2-3% of the votes. There were also a lot of online sources that state primarily many of the tiny numbers who long for the old Yugoslavia are Serbs, while, say, Slovenians have not looked back since independence in 1991. Certainly far lesser than even Ostalgie. --JNZ 20:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

A week or two ago I ran across an article about yugonostalgia in Slovenia (with their incoming presidency of the EU). It mentioned that people miss the way of life in Yugoslavia and the new EU way has brought about a change to the country which some believe is for the worse. Unfortunately, I can't find it no more. Tried Google News Search but it was bumped off - probably about a month old now. --68.145.246.117 (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Funny, I just searched again and found an article published today on the subject in the NY times - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/world/europe/30yugo.html?em&ex=1201842000&en=c56a8eecffa6b5ca&ei=5087%0A Found it: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5784869 --68.145.246.117 (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I hear that Yugo-nostalgia exists because surpisingly, a vast majority in the ex-yugoslavia actually wants reunification —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.114.241 (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

That's true. The majority of ex-yugoslavs want reunification. Many forums on line (topix.com, balkan forum etc.) confirm that fact. Ther are much more supporters of new united Yugoslavia on all those forums than those ones who oppose the idea. Between the strongest supporters of new Yugoslavia are Bosnians, Dalmatians, Serbs and Macedonians. Their number is growing bigger and bigger,and their time is coming soon . Cheers.24.86.110.10 (talk) 06:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Typical POV. Scholar example. You've decided for others what they feel, you decide on national feelings of others, you don't care what others think. Kubura (talk) 11:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL, I suggest renaming this article to "Yugo-nostalgia halucinations" with previous anon comments as relevant sources. Zenanarh (talk) 11:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yugo-nostalgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401150706/http://www.dubrovacki.hr/clanak/21270/udruzenje-nasa-jugoslavija-osniva-klubove-jugoslavena to http://www.dubrovacki.hr/clanak/21270/udruzenje-nasa-jugoslavija-osniva-klubove-jugoslavena

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Psychological?

I don't see how it is a "psychological phenomenon," at least anymore than any form of political belief is. "A political and cultural phenomenon" would be more accurate. 2601:642:C481:4640:5C38:3A5C:C91:C235 (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Agreed. The term "psychological phenomenon" is not only unsourced, but is also somewhat condescending with pejorative connotations. I've also removed "less-studied" since this is entirely subjective and non-falsifiable. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)