Talk:Yoshi's New Island

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yoshi's New Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140313001449/http://www.gonintendo.com/s/224002-details-on-the-director-behind-yoshi-s-new-island to http://www.gonintendo.com/s/224002-details-on-the-director-behind-yoshi-s-new-island

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yoshi's New Island/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: The Green Star Collector (talk · contribs) 04:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 06:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Lead

1. I'm concerned about the claim that it's a "retcon" of the Yoshi's Island ending. While I would agree that this is likely a retcon, that it is a retcon is not mentioned in the article.
2. No need for citations in the lead
3. The use of multiple babies in Yoshi's Island DS is not mentioned in the article, making me question why Baby Mario being the only baby questionable as to why it's given so much real estate in the lead. I would recommend dropping this and discussing how the game plays with eggs and other such moves, as well as how Baby Mario functions.
4. I feel like the lead could be a little meatier; consider expanding on dev info.

Infobox

1. The article does not mention that Nintendo was its publisher outside the lead and infobox
2. Is there any source on the director?
3. Is there any source on the first producer?
4. Is there any source on the artist?
5. I would recommend mentioning the composer in the article
6. Should mention the genre in Gameplay
7. The Australian release date is given two different dates, one in the article and one in the infobox

Reception

1. Nintendo Selects mention should be in sales figures, and the conflation of critical reception to this label should be removed, as they are not related and the association is not covered in the RS attached.