 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsouced edits
editHi, unsourced edits, POV pushing, etc. are against several policies/guidelines. Please take care to observe the content (and behavioural) rules. --Kjoonlee 02:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Two different pages shown now for English Wiki of Lee King Eun
editPlease be aware of the technical deception by the Pro-Japanese editors. One for the pages including of the "The truth of the hidden daughter of Lee King Eun", and the other page appears without this truth. "For the truth of history"
- Why are you so hostile to anyone even Korean editors? I welcomed you but you removed the useful template for newbies and then made a warning comments for challengers(?) What definition stands for your Pro-Japanese Korean perception? I don't know about this subject, but your way of editing appears to be a little far from constructive cooperation. This article is not owned by you. And you need a verifiable and reliable sources. --Appletrees (talk) 22:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The "hidden daughter"
editI've removed the entire section until there are sources. Corvus cornixtalk 23:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
GBE
editI've removed GBE. If he was a Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire, this doesn't belong in the first sentence, as per WP:INITIAL. In any case, it needs a reference. jnestorius(talk) 20:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
National name problem
editEmperor of Korea -> Emperor of Daehan
was the 28th Head of the Korean Imperial House, an Imperial Japanese Army general and the last crown prince of Korea.
->
was the 28th Head of the Daehan Imperial House, an Imperial Japanese Army general and the last crown prince of Daehan.
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Flimsy rationale not related to WP:AT (as is urged in many places). No support and no consensus, and already relisted once in the hope of getting it. We move on. Please also note that these three moves could and should have been raised and discussed as one multi move. Andrewa (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yi Un → Prince Uimin – Royal name instead of personal name. --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:30, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Article editor (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. The title where you tell the reader how a subject is commonly referred to, not take sides on the validity of a contested claim. One leg at a time (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.