Talk:Windmill

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Windmill
Former good articleWindmill was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 23, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wind Turbines vs Windmills

edit

I don't think Wind turbines and windmills are the same thing at all. Windmills are clearly machines that use wind to mill e.g. grain. Wind turbines generate electricity (like a gas turbine or a steam turbine). In my view, the term 'windmill' is used disparagingly to create the perception that modern wind turbines are an archaic technology. Grandwilly (talk) 00:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)GrandwillyReply

Inaccurate sources on the history of windmills

edit

From the first section;

"It has been claimed that the Babylonian emperor Hammurabi planned to use wind power for his ambitious irrigation project in the seventeenth century BCE.[7]"

This is a pretty dubious historical claim. The reference is a scientific work on windmills, without a doubt, but the author being cited has no credentials in history. The references that the author gives is to other non-historical academic works. According to Pennsylvania State University, windmills originated in the 9th century AD, i.e. the middle of the Middle Ages. That makes the above sentence so dubious that it ought to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallingfordtoday (talkcontribs) 22:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Portal:Windmills for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Windmills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Windmills until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 10:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Windmill

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Windmill's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ref1":

  • From Panemone windmill: "Part 1 — Early History Through 1875". Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved 2008-07-31.
  • From Renewable energy: "Solar-assisted heat pumps". Archived from the original on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply