Talk:William Howard Taft

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Nemov in topic Rfc for William Howard Taft's Lede Image
Featured articleWilliam Howard Taft is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 9, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
May 18, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 11, 2013, July 11, 2016, July 11, 2019, and July 11, 2021.
Current status: Featured article

Rfc for William Howard Taft's Lede Image

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for William Howard Taft? Teknologi Positif (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Teknologi Positif (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just making sure that Emiya1980 and Adam Cuerden, participants in the above discussion, are aware of this RfC and the many other image changes (and several RfCs) that have been initiated by Teknologi Positif over the past 24 hours.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Of course. Teknologi Positif (talk) 13:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
A is a featured picture, B. is absolutely full of chromatic aberration. Seriously, I'm about ready to give up on doing any restoration of any president. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 15:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Wehwalt: Other than this one (which was malformed), which RfCs might those be? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Van Buren, but I think you're aware of that. "Several" may have overstated the case, sorry. Wehwalt (talk) 22:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The Martin van Buren RfC was initiated by Emiya1980, not by Teknologi Positif, although the latter user has made one comment there. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Here are two additional photographs that have been used in the lede infobox in the last few years:

Bruce leverett (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
A and C have a common ancestor, but whilst A is cropped, C is lower resolution than A. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
A is of course, the photographer's crop. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 22:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Redrose64, Wehwalt, and Bruce leverett: Do you have a preference for any of the images listed? Emiya1980 (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would find A, B, and C acceptable. I don't like D because whatever technique was used to lighten it has resulted in an appearance of ghostly fog.

I do not understand the claim that B has chromatic aberration. How can a black-and-white photo have that problem?

I am embarrassed to be complicating the discussion further at this late stage, but I found the following interesting photo in the Wiki Commons:

This is a photo from Taft's tenure as Chief Justice. I like the relaxed smile. But I admit his tenure as President is more popularly familiar. Bruce leverett (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bruce leverett Of AC, which do you prefer? Emiya1980 (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I really do not have a preference. Bruce leverett (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bruce leverett That's disappointing to hear seeing as how you added 3 additional choices on top of the two originally presented.Emiya1980 (talk) 01:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.