This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Given that this is a controversial topic, I'll explain that I gave this article a C-class because it's missing some inline citations where they would otherwise be appropriate. It also doesn't cover Trump's responses to any of this. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 19:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I appreciate it. We shall continue to work on it.
Re: Trump's responses, it's tricky to know what to include because his responses aren't normal (IMO) and don't form a coherent narrative.
Legal responses—He sues as a delay tactic. In the government document theft case, he had a lawsuit from August 22–December 12 this year.[1] Also, in the Jan 6 investigation, he never testified after the House committee subpoenaed him in October. These have been added to this article. DOJ hasn't yet charged him with a crime, so he can't respond in a formal legal way to charges that don't exist yet. But, generally, in court, he delays or sues. This phenomenon is discussed on "Legal affairs of Donald Trump".
Threats and incitement—Throughout 2022, he expressed an interest in pardoning Capitol rioters.[2][3][4] This month, he posted to Truth Social saying "the termination of all [Constitutional] rules, regulations, and articles" would be an appropriate response to his election loss[5] and that DOJ/FBI are "Weaponized Thugs and Tyrants [who] must be dealt with".[6] These reactions are on the article "Domestic reactions to the January 6 United States Capitol attack."
Nonsense—Over the last week, since the Jan 6th House committee published its final report, he's posted to Truth Social saying "What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger,"[7] name-calling the "Unselect Committee"[8] and claiming "I had almost nothing to do with January 6th."[9] These reactions are on the article "United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack."
The Jan 6 committee just published its 845-page final report. If he has any kind of substantive response to this, we should certainly add it. But realistically I believe no one is holding their breath.
Knowing how to frame Trump's responses, or lack thereof, is a challenge. I personally don't know what more to do here right now, but maybe someone else has an idea. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
