Talk:UniMás

Comments

objetivo fama y cine de las estrellas? John wesley 13:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Lots of Biased/Questionable data

Mun2 would be considered competition against Galavision not Telefutura (First paragraph comparing the startup with mun2). Both are cable outlets (Mun2 and Galavision).

The line - "there are reports on media message boards that Telefutura is being phased out and several key on air talents are being shifted to Univision and Galavision channels." - needs citation. This is mere speculation and not fact (or if it is fact needs citation which I can't find).

Also the sale to Tribune is almost improbable (It would not comply with FCC regulations set for cap limits) (In LA tribune owns LA Times and KTLA (CW network). In Chicago WGN and the Chicago Tribune, Miami Sun Sentinal and WSFL etc etc. While duopoly's can exist they cannot coexist with newspapers (http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/reviewrules.html). This also needs some sort of citation.

Auggiego 21:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

---

UniMás (television network) → UniMás – There's nothing else name UniMás and whoever moved the article was likely a vandalist. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

• Comment if you read UniMás (television network) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) edit history, you'll see there's been a move war going on since mid-December, and 67.82.231.64 (talk · contribs) did something wrong with UniMás (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) that prevented the return of the article to the undisambiguated title. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 00:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment – I'm sorry I called 76.65.128.43 a vandalist. Still this article needs to be moved. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment 76.65.128.43 (talk) is me, and I didn't become involved in this until after you posted this move request. I think you mean 67.82.231.64 -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 01:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment - The vandal tried to move the article at a much earlier time while the network was still named TeleFutura. If you look closely in the revision history, this did not start in mid-December. It started January 5th. I tried moving it to "UniMás" this morning when the name was officially launched, but it wouldn't move. 67.82.231.64 (talk · contribs) glitched it to prevent the article from being moved there. I temporarily moved the article to "UniMás (television network)" (now that the name has officially changed) until this gets fixed.  MegastarLV  (talk) 00:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
• Endorse Now since this network launched, there's no problem to move.--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 09:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
• Strong endorse There is no need for disambiguation here. The same thing is happening at ITV, but it is because ITV1 is being renamed ITV. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 02:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
• Support. Why don't one of the admins switch it already. I wished they would change it before so we wouldn't have to wait a long time to switch. Csworldwide1 (talk) 07:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• Comment - In other words, you wish the network itself would have changed its name much earlier for the article name change? Yup, we must wait until the network officially changes its name for the article to have its name changed. Some IP vandal apparently didn't understand that.  MegastarLV  (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment - Personally Univision should've implement the change this Monday, on the eleventh anniversary of starting Telefutura. That would've been a great time to do that. I know Wiki has some protocols we have to follow and I'm not trying to alter them. Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 26 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Andrewa (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

---

UniMás → Unimás – The capital M is just how the name is stylized. 24.146.161.220 (talk) 02:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose WP:MOSTM states: "Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable." Can the OP provide any uses of 'Unimás' that outweigh 'UniMás'? -- AxG / ✉ / 10 years of editing 12:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose, there is a reasonable argument that the common name uses the capital M.  ONR  (talk)  09:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.