Talk:Ulysses S. Grant
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ulysses S. Grant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ulysses S. Grant is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ulysses S. Grant is part of the 1880 United States presidential election series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 9, 2015. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Cotton trade
editThis article is interesting giving better input on Lincoln, Grant, and the cotton trade.
- "In an ironic twist, General Grant saw and condemned the corruption inherent in the trade, but later he became renown for an administration characterized by his associates' corruption. Lincoln oversaw a system whereby his associates gained even at the possible cost of prolonging the war, but we revere him as "Honest" Abe. Lincoln was at least sensitive to the potential scandal from the cotton trade. On some instances he refused to issue permits because of the impropriety involved. Still, the cotton trade, with its attendant profitability, probably posed too great a temptation for any set of men to avoid some sinful behavior; Lincoln was not surrounded by saints."
- Source: Traders or Traitors: Northern Cotton Trading During the Civil War David G. Surdam (1999) Department of Economics Loyola University of Chicago
Under President Grant the Federal Income Tax was abolished and gold money was restored - but the article does not properly cover these matters.
editThe two most important things that happened under President Grant were the abolition of the Federal Income Tax and the restoration of gold money - the restoration of gold money is covered in the article, but low down (whereas things such as the Civil Service Commission get a leading position in the article) and the abolition of the Federal Income Tax does not seem to be covered at all. The pro Big Government bias of the article is extreme - with such things as the Civil Service Commission, which did not really advance far under President Grant, being covered - but such things as the abolition of the Federal Income Tax basically ignored. 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:60E1:9BC9:93D1:5E30 (talk) 20:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The income tax was not so much abolished, as allowed to expire, without Congress having to pass a bill or Grant having to sign it. There was debate about it, but the heavy lifting was done by Congress, not by Grant. I do not know if it is mentioned in any of the major Grant biographies. If our sources do not treat it as "the most important thing that happened", we cannot treat it as such ourselves. Bruce leverett (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would not call the Civil Service Commission "Big Goverment". It's main purpose was ensure well qualified lower appointments, rather than political cronies appointed. I believe under Grant, CSC's reforms were not always binding or mandatory. Is there a source that says when the Federal Income tax was not renewed ? Cmguy777 (talk) 02:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Here is the link from the National Archives: The Civil War taxes were not immediately repealed at the end of the war but continued in force until 1872, when the Grant administration sponsored the repeal of most of the "emergency" taxes. The federal tax on whiskey was kept. That did not stop the whiskey distillers from illegally evading the tax. Cmguy777 (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- But back to big government, the only big government legislation under Grant, possibly, was the creation of the Justice Department. That eventually ballooned into a big government federal Department. But when it started it was under staffed. Grant used it to prosecute the Klan. Cmguy777 (talk) 03:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- My claim that the Civil War income tax was "not so much abolished, as allowed to expire", was from this paper by Sheldon Pollack,[1] which is cited in Income tax in the United States. Bruce leverett (talk) 00:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Here is the link from the National Archives: The Civil War taxes were not immediately repealed at the end of the war but continued in force until 1872, when the Grant administration sponsored the repeal of most of the "emergency" taxes. The federal tax on whiskey was kept. That did not stop the whiskey distillers from illegally evading the tax. Cmguy777 (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would not call the Civil Service Commission "Big Goverment". It's main purpose was ensure well qualified lower appointments, rather than political cronies appointed. I believe under Grant, CSC's reforms were not always binding or mandatory. Is there a source that says when the Federal Income tax was not renewed ? Cmguy777 (talk) 02:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Pollack, Sheldon D. (2014). "The First National Income Tax, 1861–1872" (PDF). Tax Lawyer. 67 (2).
Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ulysses S. Grant was posthumously promoted to the rank of General of the Armies in H.J.Resolution 58 — 117th Congress (2021-2022)and S.J. Resolution 26, known as the Ulysses S. Grant Bicentennial Recognition Act. This promotion was originally supposed to be done on the bicentennial of his birth, April 27, 2022. However delays resulted in the promotion not occurring until the Bill was signed by U.S. President Joe Biden on December 23,2022 formally promoting him. For more information regarding his promotion please see the references below.
References:
H.J Res. 58- 117th Congress Sponsor: Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2] (Introduced 09/14/2021) Committees: House - Armed Services Latest Action: House - 09/14/2021 Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
S.J.Res.26 - Ulysses S. Grant Bicentennial Recognition Act 117th Congress (2021-2022) Sponsor: Sen. Blunt, Roy [R-MO] (Introduced 09/22/2021) Committees: Senate - Judiciary Latest Action: Senate - 09/22/2021 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill was subsequently signed by U.S. President Joe Biden on December 23, 2022 officialing promoting Ulysses S. Grant to the rank of General of the Armies. Vigil368 (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The act of congress is mentioned in Note a.
- The act of congress did not promote Grant, it only authorized a promotion; the new rank is not in effect until the Department of Defense carries out the promotion. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:14, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The law, as written in the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 states, "[t]he President is authorized to appoint Ulysses S. Grant posthumously to the grade of General of the Armies of the United States, equal to the rank and precedence held by General John J. Pershing pursuant to the Act titled “An Act Relating to the creation of the office of General of the Armies of the United States”, approved September 3, 1919 (41 Stat. 283, ch. 56).”
- While the president is “authorized” by Congress to promote Grant to General of the Armies, President Biden has yet to exercise that authorization, and issue an appointment order to the Army to promote him. Meaning Grant still does not hold that rank. Neovu79 (talk) 06:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Authorization issued on April 19, 2024. Page updated to reflect this. BryanGaensler (talk) 15:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)