Talk:Trianon syndrome
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Super Dromaeosaurus in topic an "aftermath" section is impossible for a phenomenon still existing
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trianon syndrome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Syndrome in popular culture
edithttps://maszol.ro/kultura/107000-gyogyithato-e-irodalommal-a-trianon-szindroma-vallasek-julia-irodalomtorteneszt-kerdeztuk I do not read Hungarian to summarise the text. Please help.Xx236 (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
an "aftermath" section is impossible for a phenomenon still existing
editSo please change the name rather than to remove it. BTW - The memorial with a map is very informative.Xx236 (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I restored the information you added and integrated it into a paragraph. I can't change the name of an article that only covers one sentence about a holiday. What is its scope supposed to be? And why should that particular sentence have a section of its own while the rest of the info stays undivided? And yes, I restored one memorial image, but the article is short, so we don't need so many. Super Ψ Dro 14:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I do not care about any details, but I believe that the page is too short.Xx236 (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The article would ideally get expanded before getting divided into sections. If we did so right now, the sections would be too short and the lead (which is supposed to summarize the contents of the article) would basically be a duplicate of the article. If you want to expand it, you're more than welcome to do so, but please take article format into account. Super Ψ Dro 14:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)