Talk:Top Secret America
A fact from Top Secret America appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links
edit- http://www.TopSecretAmerica.com doesn't go to a website, but it might just be my ISP.
- http://www.dni.gov/content/Truth_About_Contractors.pdf was taken off line, I think. I will leave the link for a few days in case somebody can find another source for the document.
See also section
editNot really seeing a need for it per WP:SEEALSO. Viriditas (talk) 22:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sure. I'm absolutely fine with removing the whole section. Your call. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Just raising the issue with you, as you are the primary contributor. I leave it in your hands. Viriditas (talk) 03:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I removed it. If anyone wants it back, I won't mind. I am perfectly happy either way. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Need for a Criticism Section
editSince the Intelligence Community is forbidden by Law to comment on any of the assertions in this article, why not include an independent criticism section? Wikipedia needs to open this discussion to other dissenting opinions or risk the charge of Political Advocacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Christopher Wells (talk • contribs) 06:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Reaction section
editPer WP:LONGQUOTE: "Do not insert any number of quotations in a stand-alone quote section", should the Top Secret America#Reaction section be modified or removed, or is it appropriate? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:37, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Top Secret America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/The-Washington-Post-Reveals-Top-Secret-America-4362
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)